UN Web Site | UN Web Site Locator
Online discussion forums   Home   Site map   Contact  
Search  
 
More Options | Tips
Bangkok, Thailand
Transport Division Home
Trans-Asian Railway Home
   
50 years of Trans-Asian Railway
Map
   
Facts and figures
   
Frequently asked questions
   
Network identification
   
Network operationalization
   
Network formalization
   
The break-of-gauge issue
   
Other activities
 
Railway level-crossing protection
     
 
Marketing railway services
     
 
Policy Framework for the Development of Intermodal Interfaces
     
 
Priortity Investment Needs - TAR
Priority Investment Needs for the Development of TAR Network
   
Upcoming meetings
   
Publications
   
Contact us

 


Trans-Asian Railway and the issue of
break-of-gauge


1. Definition

2. Most common track gauges on the Trans-Asian Railway network

3. Break-of-gauge points on the Trans-Asian Railway network

4. Overcoming the break-of-gauge

5. Break-of-gauge: is the obstacle real?

Definitions

Track gauge: the track gauge is the distance between the inner surfaces of each rail of a same track. Conventionally, it is measured in millimeters.

Break-of-gauge: a break-of-gauge occurs when the railways of neighbouring countries have different track gauges (see above). The consequence is that rolling-stock cannot be exchanged across borders, thereby calling for measures to transfer people and cargo. It must be noted that discontinuity of track gauge also occurs within individual domestic railway networks.

Back to top

Most common track gauges on the Trans-Asian Railway network
The mainline railway networks making up the TAR network incorporate five different track gauges, i.e. 1,676 mm, 1,520 mm, 1,435 mm, 1,067 mm and 1,000 mm (Map). It must be noted that other gauges are also found in some countries (e.g. 762 mm in India) but these line are not part of the Trans-Asian Railway network. (Track gauges and overall route length by country along the TAR network).

Break-of-gauge points on the Trans-Asian Railway network

On the Trans-Asian Railway network, rail border crossings at which a break-of-gauge occur are between the following countries:

(i)
  China (1,435 mm) and Viet Nam (1,000 mm),
(ii)
  China (1,435 mm) and the Russian Federation (1,520 mm),
(iii)
  China (1,435 mm) and Mongolia (1,520 mm),
(iv)
  China (1,435 mm) and Kazakhstan (1,520 mm),
(v)
  Democratic People's Republic of Korea (1,435 mm) and
  the Russian Federation (1,520 mm),
(vi)
  Islamic Republic of Iran (1,435 mm) and Turkmenistan (1,520
  mm),
(vii)
  Islamic Republic of Iran (1,435 mm) and Azerbaijan (1,520 mm),
(viii)
  Turkey (1,435 mm) and Armenia (1,520 mm).

When the construction of the rail link between Kerman and Zahedan in the Islamic Republic of Iran is completed, another break-of-gauge will occur between this country and Pakistan.

In addition, discontinuity of track gauge also occurs within the individual domestic railway networks of Bangladesh and India.


Back to top

Overcoming the break-of-gauge

A break-of-gauge is often seen as an obstacle to the smooth flow of traffic. However, a number of technical solutions exist to reduce its effect on the efficiency of rail services. These solutions include transhipment, bogie changing and the use of wagons with ‘variable-gauge’ bogies.

(i) Transhipment is the transfer of freight by manual or mechanical means from wagons of one gauge to wagons of another gauge.

(ii) Bogie changing is the operation by which wagons are lifted on a set of jacks, bogies of one gauge rolled out and bogies of the other gauge rolled in.

(iii) The Use of wagons with ‘variable-gauge’ bogies enables wagons to be pulled along a special transition track at reduced speed. During the process, the distance between wheels is adjusted from one track gauge to another.

(iv) Two other solutions exist. One involves the provision of dual gauge, i.e. the provision of two different track gauges on a single track foundation through the insertion of a third rail (or sometimes a fourth rail to obtain the so-called ‘composite gauge’). The other option is to convert tracks of different gauges to a single gauge standard. However, these two solutions are viable only when different standards are applied within the same country or for cross-border movements over a very short distance to fit specific requirements such as extending a line section of one country onto the territory of another country to gain access to specific installations or sites, e.g. ports or mining sites.


Back to top

Break-of-gauge: is the obstacle real?

While continuity of gauge along all routes of the Trans-Asian Railway would be ideal, a break-of-gauge does not constitute a major problem to efficient services. With limited exception, break-of-gauges occur mostly at border points where a range of operations already require trains to stop. These operations are generated by railway needs (e.g. change of locomotives, change of crew) or the requirements of other administrations (e.g. Customs, border police). Well-designed and well-organized facilities allow for transhipment to take place within the time allocated for these other operations, the disappearance of which cannot yet be realistically envisaged.

In addition, the bulk of time-sensitive traffic is containerized cargo which, by nature, lend itself well to fast and efficient transhipment.

Finally, efficient transhipment often takes place within a few hours representing a fraction of the overall transit time over distances of 3,000 km or more.

Back to top

Copyright© 2013 UNESCAP  Legal Notice