UN Web Site | UN Web Site Locator
Home Site map Contact 
ESCAP Statistics Division
ESCAP Statistics Division
About Us | Media Centre | Members | Programmes | Documents | Publications | Jobs | Bangkok, Thailand
 
ESCAP Statistical Newsletter
 
Search:
More Options | Search Tips
 
Statistical Newsletter - No. 116, January 2000
Contents From the Editor

This issue is published in a positive period for the Statistics Division of ESCAP: after a long with vacancies, our division is fully staffed with the recent arrival of three new colleagues. The staff movements section contains their names and short backgrounds.

The Working Group of Statistical Experts held its 11th meeting, a short article summarizes its main conclusions and discussions as all the documents and the final report of the meeting are available on-line.

This issue also features the application of new information technology to population data and the interrelated subjects of time-use surveys and the measurement of paid and unpaid work. Many of the activities under the project on the application of new information technology are being concluded, whereas activities on time-use surveys and the measurement of paid and unpaid work are just starting.

A number of selected news items on training opportunities and conferences are presented as usual. A "special" article provides information on selected Web-based resources about poverty statistics: this field is increasingly attracting attention among the international statistical community as the methodological and practical challenges are stimulating, and the contribution of statistics towards the resolution of the problem of "poverty" is fundamental.

The Workshop on Application of New Information Technology to Population Data and the fifth meeting of the project Working Party were held in Bangkok in October 1999

The Workshop on Application of New Information Technology to Population Data was held in Bangkok from 12 to 20 October 1999. Funded by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) under the project RAS/96/P12, it was organized by the ESCAP secretariat with active support of the Working Party on the Application of New Technology to Population Data, consisting of nine experts from Australia, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, Macau, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Representatives of the Statistical Institute for Asia and the Pacific (SIAP), and UNFPA Country Support Teams for East and South-East Asia, and for Central and South Asia participated as resource persons. Invited private sector companies also participated as observers and made presentations. The Workshop was attended by thirty participants from eighteen selected countries in the Asian and Pacific region.

The Workshop was inaugurated by Ms Kayoko Mizuta, the Deputy Executive Secretary of ESCAP. In her opening statement, Ms Mizuta welcomed the participants and thanked the donor agency and resource persons for their commitment to the successful organization and funding of the Workshop. She also appreciated the cooperation extended by private sector organizations to the Workshop.

In noting the benefits of new technology to statistical services in the region, Ms Mizuta emphasized the role information technology (IT) played in reducing costs of census and survey operations. While it was not possible to present the full spectrum of technological innovations in just one workshop, she hoped that, by sharing information and experiences in significant areas of IT, participants would enrich and further improve their understanding of new technologies relevant for their operations. In wishing the Workshop success, Ms Mizuta closed her statement by highlighting that the Workshop materials would be made available through the project Web site.

Readers can access all the meeting documents of the Working Party and those of the Workshop through the ESCAP Statistics Division's Web site at: http://www.unescap.org/stat/pop-it/index.htm

The Working Group of Statistical Experts marked its eleventh session from 23 to 26 November 1999 with discussions on key statistical developments in the Asia-Pacific region

The eleventh session of the Working Group of Statistical Experts was held in Bangkok from 23 to 26 November 1999.

The meeting was attended by representatives of 23 members and associate members of ESCAP, representatives of the other United Nations bodies and specialized agencies, representatives of other international and regional organizations and also by the Statistical Institute for Asia and the Pacific (SIAP).

The meeting was opened by the Executive Secretary of ESCAP, who expressed pleasure at the strong participation of countries and agencies at the meeting and at the close interest it denoted in the statistical work of ESCAP. He noted the increasing significance of the Working Group of Statistical Experts and its influence on the deliberations of the Committee on Statistics and of the ESCAP Commission. He thanked the Bureau of the Committee for their support of the secretariat's work.

The substantial discussions of the session focussed on the following points as approved in the agenda:

  • Overview of significant global and regional issues in official statistics,
  • Census 2000 and its implementation in Asia and the Pacific,
  • Application of new technology to population data,
  • Poverty statistics,
  • Gender statistics,
  • Development indicators,
  • International standard classifications: developments and status of implementation,
  • Year 2000 problem: preparedness of national statistical offices.
Furthermore, on 26 November, the Working Group held an open forum on the topic of Development of Performance Indicators for National Statistical Offices.

The full report of the session, together with all the documents presented at the meeting, is linked through the Meetings page of the Statistics Division web site at the URL http://www.unescap.org/stat/meet/techmeet.htm therefore, only excerpts of the session's report will be presented here. Readers interested to access the meeting documents or the full report can do so through the Internet or by a direct request to the contact addresses on the last page.

Overview of significant global and regional issues in official statistics

Under this agenda item, participants were briefed about developments in official statistics originating mainly from recent sessions of the United Nations Statistical Commission, the ESCAP Commission and the Subcommittee on Statistical Activities of the Administrative Committee on Coordination.

Activities of the City Groups and themes discussed at the Helsinki session of the International Statistical Institute (ISI) were also covered.

The discussion on economic topics, focussed on the 1993 SNA and related satellite accounts and the phenomenon of e-commerce. For the latter, "...Noting that electronic commerce was not the main subject of discussion in any of the existing global statistical forums, the Working Group recommended that such a group be created".

On the 1993 SNA, participants were informed about the intended increase of technical cooperation activities by the OECD, which planned to cooperate with ESCAP and ADB in their implementation.

An update on the progress of work of the Expert Group on Informal Sector Statistics (the Delhi Group) was also provided.

The General Data Dissemination System (GDDS) and Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) are still proving lively topics of discussion. The Working Group noted that ESCAP had a role to play in providing assistance in implementing the GDDS, thus concentrating on countries still developing their statistical systems.

The Working Group concurred with the concerns expressed by the Statistical Commission and ESCAP Commission that implementation of the SDDS in particular might drain scarce statistical resources away from national priority areas. Participants raised concerns about country-ranking exercises made by the media, based on data regarding the implementation of SDDS.

The accuracy of data at national level as published by international organizations and the dissemination policies of the countries concluded the discussion under this agenda item. To be highlighted is the issue of pricing data disseminated in electronic format, which received considerable attention.

Census 2000 and its implementation in Asia and the Pacific

The Working Group noted that a large number of countries/areas in the region planned to undertake a population and housing census in either 2000 or 2001.  Several countries conducted their censuses on a quinquennial basis; the scope of those censuses varied according to the census cycle and national data needs.  The Working Group noted that in some countries, including those in Central Asia where the 2000 round of censuses were the first after they had attained independence, particular challenges were faced owing to the process of transition to the market economy and the deterioration of previous systems of data collection.

The Working Group was informed that the United Nations publication Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses had been revised and circulated for use during the 2000 round of censuses.

The Working Group expressed its appreciation of external assistance, especially that made available by UNFPA, which had played a significant role during the earlier census decades in the conduct of censuses in the least developed and island developing countries.  It noted with regret, however, that such assistance was shrinking. In view of that emerging scenario, the Working Group felt that technical cooperation among the countries of the region assumed greater importance.

The Working Group took note of the preparations for the forthcoming round of censuses and various issues encountered by countries.  It observed that most countries had been following an elaborate process of consultation with various data users and stakeholders in designing questionnaires, while in some cases feedback was also sought on data dissemination.  The Working Group noted that many countries would do a 100 per cent head count using a short questionnaire form, while in many instances detailed questions would be canvassed through a longer questionnaire on a sample basis.  Raising public awareness of the importance of censuses was mentioned as one key success factor in their conduct. Singapore's unique tri-modal census data collection strategy also attracted attention.

Application of new technology to population data

A large portion of the discussion covered the activities of the Working Party on the Application of New Technology to Population Data. It was recalled that the Working Party had met five times and had recently organized a workshop on this theme (see related article in this issue).

It was noted that statistical offices could best benefit from information technology (IT) if they adopted it on a systematic and continuous basis. The Working Group agreed that the traditional way of conducting censuses and surveys had to make way for a more IT-intensive method.

Other linkages between the theme of application of new technologies and census activities were emphasized. Issues on pricing came up again.

Poverty statistics

The Working Group first recalled some useful findings from the seminar in poverty statistics held in Bangkok in June 1999. The fact that many countries throughout the region agreed on defining poverty in terms of deprivation was positive, as it offers a common basis for poverty measurement. However, differences in the methodologies used for the measurement of poverty were noted. There was also a recognition that the measurement of poverty was at diverse stages across countries.

A topic of great interest for the Working Group was the adoption of poverty reduction by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) as its new overarching objective. The implications, especially in terms of resources devoted to poverty measurement, were recognized and ADB briefed the Working Group on the strategy being developed.

The fact that poverty measurement was so important for various countries of the ESCAP region led to speculation about whether the development of a common methodology could be beneficial to countries themselves. In this context, prominence needed to be given to the satisfaction of national needs, further exploratory work on international comparability of poverty statistics was considered an important goal. The leading role played by the Rio Group on Poverty Statistics was recognized and countries of the region were invited to participate in its work.

In endorsing the recommendations of the Seminar on Poverty Statistics, the Working Group strongly urged the Asian Development Bank  to take up these recommendations in the course of implementing its technical assistance activities on poverty reduction.

Gender statistics and Time Use surveys

The Working Group recalled that addressing gender issues in important fields such as measuring employment was one of the recommendations from the Platform of Action of the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995.

This important fact led the Working Group to recognize the importance of making progress in measuring paid and unpaid work and time use (see the article on the Ahmedabad seminar).

Several countries contributed to the discussion by highlighting rather different approaches to the subject, reflecting primarily the diversity of social and cultural practices across the region. It was recognized that time use surveys were likely to improve the quality of countries' labour statistics and that the conduct of time use surveys needed careful planning.

Development indicators

The Working Group noted that the series of global conferences and summits during the 1990s had generated new statistical data requirements for evaluating progress on the goals adopted, and considered it useful for national statistical agencies to be more involved in future such meetings.  It welcomed Resolution 1999/55 adopted by the Economic and Social Council on 30 July 1999 and appreciated in particular the recognition by the Council of the need to  lessen the data provision burden on member States pertaining to the basic indicators needed as a follow-up to the conferences. It noted that overlap among international organizations in the creation of indicators and collection of information persisted.  The Working Group welcomed  the Council's realization of the importance of strengthening national statistical capacity, and  supported the full involvement of the regional commissions and recipient countries in the proposed high-level working group on donor coordination in support of national statistical development strategies.

The Working Group reviewed various core indicator sets that had been developed. Among them it noted that UNDAF-CCA had by far the largest number of indicators.  It expressed concern that some of the indicators were not methodologically robust; moreover, many were neither  readily available nor were needed for national requirements.

Other important points discussed concerned the Human Development Index (HDI) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Human Development Report. The Working Group noted many expressions of misgivings with regard to the HDI and heard with concern that some national statistical organizations were obliged to utilize their limited resources to respond and to clarify misconceptions generated by the Reports. The Working Group appealed to international agencies to use statistical data responsibly, and to be mindful of  the potential implications that publication of erroneous or conceptually controversial statistics had on the countries concerned.

The Working Group also noted with interest the efforts made by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in developing national progress indicators in response to the issue of the appropriateness of GDP as a single measure of progress. The various options to achieve measures of progress and their corresponding methodological implications were discussed by the Working Group.

International standard classifications: developments and status of implementation

The discussion of the Working Group on this issue was based on the outcomes of a recent meeting on classifications held in Canberra, from 27 September to 1 October 1999. The meeting, organized by the United Nations Statistics Division with the collaboration of the Australian Bureau of Statistics and ESCAP, was attended by 14 countries, almost all from the ESCAP region, and a number of regional and international organizations.

The Working Group noted that the Workshop, being the first in the region to deal with classifications in general, had focused on the current implementation of activity and product classifications, policy needs and strategic planning for classification work, and on introducing to participants the international family of economic and social classifications.  Most of the countries represented at the Workshop had implemented an activity classification based on the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC), Rev.3, while the much more recent Central Product Classification (CPC) was being implemented or considered for implementation by only some of the countries.

The Working Group noted the need expressed by the Canberra Workshop for a more regional approach to the development and adaptation of classifications, whereby countries with similar economic structures might wish to coordinate their detailing of the categories of international standards such as ISIC or CPC.

The Working Group requested the secretariat to survey the status of implementation of classifications in the region, from which might emerge the need for the development of regional or subregional variants of standard international classifications.  The Working Group also asked the secretariat to keep countries abreast of developments in the classifications field through the regular dissemination of information. The Working Group also noted that classification work would be undertaken in two areas which were of particular interest to developing countries of the region, namely statistics on the informal sector (in conjunction with the Delhi Group) and time use surveys.

The Working Group noted with interest the discussions at the Canberra Workshop on the design of alternative groupings of activities in classifications, and considered that the region could make significant contributions in that regard.  Currently, for instance, although the "tourism industry" and "information industry" were very important in many economies of the region, it was difficult to obtain data on them using the current configurations of activity or product classifications.  The Working Group also noted that because agriculture and fisheries continued to account for sizeable proportions of GDP and employment in many Asian and Pacific countries, the case for a more detailed breakdown of those sectors in existing classifications was a strong one.

Year 2000 problem: preparedness of national statistical offices

The Working Group was pleased to note that the discussions in the previous session of the Working Group in November 1997 had been instrumental in initiating discussion at the ESCAP Commission level.  The consequent activities by the secretariat and SIAP had significantly improved Y2K awareness in the region and had given a boost to the rectification efforts in various national statistical offices.

The Working Group agreed that the NSOs should use the remaining weeks of 1999 for last-minute contingency preparations, rather than for initiating new rectification efforts that could not be completed before the change of the century.  Some NSOs that had started Year 2000 rectification early and had subjected their systems to prudent testing expressed confidence in being internally Y2K compliant. The Working Group heard that one NSO had maintained the capacity to revert to its old non-compliant applications, if its rectified and tested applications failed for unexpected reasons.

Seminar on time use surveys, 7-10 December 1999, Ahmedabad, India

A seminar on time use surveys was held in Ahmedabad from 7 to 10 December 1999. The seminar was jointly organized by the Government of India, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the Centre For Development Alternatives (CFDA) and ESCAP in collaboration with several national and international partners.

Time use surveys were recognized as becoming increasingly important for estimating the value of paid and unpaid work. While developed countries use these studies mainly for measuring unpaid and household work, developing countries tend to utilize them also for estimating the size of the workforce and its contribution to the national income. Though several micro level studies have been conducted by scholars in developing countries, India was one of the first countries in the region to conduct a large-scale time use survey, covering six major states of the country.

The seminar was divided into the following sessions:

  1. Inaugural Session;
  2. Technical Sessions 1 & 2: Time Use Studies: Conceptual, Methodological and Operational Dimensions;
  3. Technical Session 3: Labour Force/Work Force Estimation and Employment Policies;
  4. Technical Session 4: Valuation and Compiling Satellite Accounts;
  5. Technical Session 5: Analysis of Time Use Patterns and Policy Implications;
  6. Technical Session 6: Towards a Global Consensus;
  7. Valedictory Session.
The seminar made several recommendations for national governments, international organizations, researchers and activists:

Recommendations

  1. Time use surveys provide detailed information on how individuals spend their time and reveal the structure of individuals' daily lives with a combination of detail and comprehensiveness not achieved in any other type of social survey. Consequently, such surveys are highly valuable for understanding the socio-economic life of people and for policy making in the social and economic spheres. The seminar noted that each economy could be viewed as a binary economy, consisting of household and market economies, which produce GHP (Gross Household Product) and GMP (Gross Market Product) respectively. It is important to understand, measure and monitor both the economies. It is important therefore for countries to carry out time use surveys in a fairly regular fashion.
  2. There is a need to strengthen national statistical offices by equipping them with the required skills and capabilities for this purpose. It will be useful therefore:
    1. to prepare guidelines and instruction manuals for conducting time use studies;
    2. to prepare resource kits and training materials as well as organize suitable training programmes as and when needed;
    3. To provide country specific needs/concerns of countries and to develop a methodology that suits the specific situation of the country.

As far as the conceptual framework and methodology of time use surveys are concerned,

    1. It is important that time use studies include both paid and unpaid work. Since developed countries also experience home work and home based work, time use surveys can be a useful tool to capture realistic estimates of the work force/labour force even in developed countries;
    2. There is a need to do further work on the Trial Classification of Time Use Activities, particularly (as done in India) in the first three categories of the classification. A classification will emerge gradually with more and more countries undertaking time use studies;
    3. The seminar has contributed significantly towards moving in the direction of a global consensus with respect to concept, methodology, activity classification etc. The Indian time use study has developed concepts and methodology which can be modified to suit specific needs of developing countries. One can gradually build on the achievements of the seminar to evolve global consensus with regard to major methodological issues;
    4. It was felt that as far as data collection on time use patterns is concerned, it will be necessary to train enumerators if the interview method is used, or to monitor the quality of data if the diary method is used.

Some other issues emerged from the seminar. These are presented in detail in the report of the seminar, which is available in the ESCAP Statistics Division's web site at http://www.unescap.org/stat/meet/timeuse/timeuse.asp together with most of the seminar papers. Copies for those who do not have Internet access will be made available on request.

Conferences / Training opportunities / Other news

Training in survey research techniques by the Summer Institute of the University of Michigan

The Summer Institute in Survey Research Techniques is a teaching programme of the Survey Research Center, at the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

The Survey Research Center was established at the University of Michigan in 1946 to interact effectively with all parts of the University and to perform five major functions:

  1. Provide a well-trained staff and research capability for conducting surveys on economic and social problems;
  2. Conduct methodological research for the improvement and development of survey procedures;
  3. Help in the integration of the social sciences by providing facilities for interdisciplinary research on social problems;
  4. Foster theoretical advancement in the social sciences based on new data from interdisciplinary research;
  5. Provide graduate training in all phases of survey methodology.
The summer of 2000 marks the 53rd consecutive Summer Institute, and offers courses covering a complete range of techniques employed in social science and other sample surveys.

Courses will take place from 5 June to 28 July 2000 and are offered in one-week, two-week, four-week, and eight-week formats, allowing participants to tailor their course elections to their individual interests and time constraints.

Covered topics include:

  • Survey sampling methods
  • Survey data analysis
  • Multi-level analysis
  • Social science research methods
  • Qualitative methods
  • Cognitive foundations
  • Questionnaire design
  • Event history analysis
  • Handling missing data
  • Computer assisted interviewing
Courses may be taken with or without academic credits, and costs are different for these two options. Participants who do not take classes for credit can expect to pay between $700 for a one-week class to $2,100 for four classes.

Further information should be sought at the following address:

Summer Institute
Institute for Social Research
Survey Research Center
P.O. Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI
48106-1248 U.S.A.

Toll Free Telephone: (877) 880-9389
Direct Telephone: (734) 764-6595
Fax: (734) 764-8263
E-mail: summers@isr.umich.edu
Web site: http://www.isr.umich.edu/src/si/

2000 Summer Workshops in Washington, at the International Programs Center (IPC) of the U.S. Bureau of the Census

The International Programs Center of the U.S. Bureau of the Census has organized six workshops for the summer 2000. These workshops are product oriented and cover practical skills needed in a statistical office.

Courses are as follows:

  1. Analysis and Evaluation of Gender Statistics, 8 - 26 May (3 weeks, US $3,000);
  2. Sampling and Statistical Methods, 30 May - 23 June (4 weeks, US $4,000);
  3. Subnational Population Projections for Planning, 26 June - 21 July (4 weeks, US $4,000) ;
  4. Geographic Information Systems (GIS), 24 July - 1 September (6 weeks, US $7,200, includes commercial software)
  5. Census and Survey Processing, 5 - 29 September (4 weeks, US $4,000)
  6. Building an Integrated Data Dissemination System, 2 - 20 October (3 weeks, US $3,000)
The U.S. Bureau of the Census invites all interested people, participants and sponsors, to apply at their earliest convenience as courses tend to fill rapidly.

For large groups or specific training needs, the U.S. Bureau of the Census invites statistical agencies and organizations to contact them and discuss the possibility of organizing custom-tailored workshops.

For questions and comments please contact:

Bureau of the Census
International Programs Center
Training and Technical Assistance Branch
Washington Plaza II, Room 309
Washington, D.C. 20233-8860
Tel. (301) 457 1444
Fax. (301) 457 3033
E-mail: ipcta@census.gov

Information on the application procedures can be found at the following Web site: http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/impstrain00.html

The 2000 cycle of training seminars of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has a long tradition in providing international training. As it did in past years, this summer it will again organize selected courses on labour statistics.

These courses have the structure of seminars and can be addressed to final users or trainers: in this last case any seminar, except for Managing Information Technology, might be followed by a Training of Trainers course designed specifically for participants who need to train their colleagues on material learned in a BLS seminar. Courses include field trips, lectures, workshops and discussions.

Seminars have a duration of 4 to 6 weeks. The programme includes the following seminars:

  • Managing Information Technology (4 weeks), 15 May - 9 June
  • Measuring Employment and Unemployment (6 weeks), 15 May - 23 June
  • Labor Market Information (5 weeks), 22 May - 23 June
  • Measuring Productivity (5 weeks), 26 June - 28 July
  • Analyzing Labor Statistics (6 weeks), 14 August - 22 September
  • Constructing Price Indexes (6 weeks), 14 August - 22 September
  • Economic Indicators (5 weeks), 16 October - 17 November
More detailed information is available at hte following contact address:

Elizabeth A. Taylor, Director
International Labor Statistics Center
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Room 2190
2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20212-0001

Telephone number: (202) 691-5666
Fax number: (202) 691-7900
E-mail: Int_Train@bls.gov
Web site http://www.bls.gov/intview.htm

The Conference of the International Association for Official Statistics (IAOS) on "Statistics, Development and Human Rights"

The Swiss Federal Statistical Office (SFSO) and the Swiss Development and Cooperation Agency (SDC) are organizers of the next independent Conference of the International Association for Official Statistics.

The Conference is organized with the support of several other organizations. The International Association for Official Statistics (IAOS), a section of the International Statistical Institute (ISI), brings together producers and users of official statistics. The objectives of IAOS are  to promote the understanding and advancement of official statistics and related subjects and to foster the development of effective and efficient official statistical services, particularly in developing countries, through international contacts among individuals and organizations, including users of official statistics as well as research institutions.

The Conference aims:

  • To consider the development and use of official statistics as a tool for observing and measuring the implementation of human rights and the effectiveness of human development.
  • To promote a dialogue and a multidisciplinary exchange of experiences between producers of official statistics and the users of this information, in particular those involved in the implementation of human rights, in political debate, policy design, scientific research and analysis, as well as in the media.
  • To allow individuals, research institutes, NGOs and national and international organisations active in the fields of statistics, development and human rights, to improve mutual knowledge, to strengthen links of cooperation and to consider possibilities of future joint action.
The Conference is not intended to focus on a political debate on current violations of human rights, nor to qualify or assess national human development achievements.

Several personalities have already confirmed that they will deliver keynote addresses to the Conference, thus highlighting the high political significance of this event.

The official languages of the Conference will be English and French.

The Conference sessions will be grouped in six topic areas:

  • Childhood at a Glance (special session)
  • Cross-Cutting Issues
  • Civil and Political Rights
  • Statistics, Human Rights and Population Issues
  • Human Development, Economic and Social Rights
  • Human Rights at the Core of Statistical Policies
corresponding to different areas of the contribution of statistics to development and human rights' implementation.

The programme of the Conference provides mainly for invited papers sessions. However, contributed papers on themes similar to those of the invited papers sessions can be proposed by any participant in the Conference and will be organized in parallel contributed papers sessions.

For further information on the Conference you may address your enquiries to:

IAOS Conference Secretariat
Swiss Federal Statistical Office
Espace de l'Europe 10
CH - 2010 Neuchâtel Switzerland
Tel   + 41 32 713 60 83
Fax  + 41 32 713 60 93
E-mail: iaos2000@bfs.admin.ch
Web site http://www.iaos2000.admin.ch

PARIS21: something to keep an eye on

What is PARIS21?

"In a world of infinite needs and finite resources Governments and Donors need to direct resources with the greatest effectiveness towards tackling the big development issues. ... " with these words starts the home page which describes the outcome of the Joint UN/OECD/World Bank/IMF Senior Expert Meeting on Statistical Capacity Building, held in Paris, 18-19 November 1999.

PARIS21 (PARtnerships In Statistics for development in the 21st Century) is a consortium created upon agreement between developing countries and donors to ensure adequate funding and support for national statistical systems.

The initiative aims to help bridge the gaps in statistical capacity which are affecting the ability to formulate effective policy in developing countries.
All heads of aid agencies, heads of statistical offices in United Nations member countries, participants at the 18-19 November meeting and permanent delegates to the OECD Development Assistance Committee have been asked to nominate contact persons and members to participate in the following three task forces:

  • Task force 1 - Addressing the data requirements of policy frameworks. This task force will examine urgently the ways in which country-owned sustainable statistical systems can be included within development framework initiatives. The secretariat of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD is already in contact with the other multilateral secretariats to ensure that every Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) or strategic plan contains a clear statement of data and monitoring requirements.
  • Task force 2 - Building Strategic Statistical Master Plans. A highly practical approach is anticipated, initiating pilots in a few countries to test out the process for producing a Strategic Statistical Master Plan.
  • Task force 3 - Best Practice and Effective Technical Cooperation. A practical approach is also anticipated for this task force to appraise current or recent projects in order to focus on success stories in statistics.

PARIS21 is in continuous and rapid evolution and readers interested in obtaining fresh information should refer to the web site at http://www.paris21.org/.

What's on the Web on "poverty statistics"

Continuing to search the Web to find useful links on various statistical subjects, this time we write about our searches in the field of poverty statistics. This is a hot issue and abundant results came from the search engines, but very much of what was found did not really constitute a good enough hit. Or, sometimes, results were geographically-related to specific countries or areas.

For this reason we invite our readers to consider the Web sites we present here only as a useful starting point, and to perform other searches if information is needed on poverty statistics related to a particular country (see issue 114 on how to locate statistical information on the Internet). However, we believe that the web sites presented would be very useful to all those who have to work within this subject. Experts in poverty statistics who would like to highlight web resources that we missed finding are warmly invited to write to the editor.

Some of the links we propose refer to Web sites of statistical agencies of the United States government. In particular, the U.S. Census Bureau has its poverty page at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty.html, an initial reference of very well featured pages referring to either the methodology utilized or current data and indicators for the United States.

This is not the only U.S. Web site where good information can be found, look also at http://stats.bls.gov/opub/mlr/index.htm by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which offers poverty related information from a "labour"-wide perspective.

A third site we propose is a U.S. academic Web site, http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/poverty/ which presents the book "Measuring Poverty: A New Approach" by the National Academy of Sciences. A useful summary is presented together with other information concerning the book, which lists several recommendations on how to deal with the measurement of poverty.

"Poverty Guidelines, Research, and Measurement" at http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/poverty/poverty.htm is another U.S. web site dealing with this subject. Of special interest are some articles on methodology available as Acrobat documents.

Particularly impressive is the World Bank's web site on poverty, including poverty measurement, at http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/index.htm.
Very useful are their web links and the Poverty Monitoring Database which provides quick access to comprehensive poverty information, although the quality of the data and estimates will inevitably be variable until more work is undertaken on poverty measurement.

Two other valuable web sites for information are that of the Rio Group on Poverty Statistics at http://www.ibge.gov.br/poverty/ and ESCAP's own pages on the "Seminar on poverty statistics" at http://www.unescap.org/stat/meet/povstat/povstat.htm; the seminar was organized by the Statistics Division in June 1999 (see Statistical Newsletter No. 114).

To conclude, you can visit the web site of the National Statistical Coordination Board of the Philippines at http://www.nscb.gov.ph/poverty/ and find abundant and updated information, together with useful technical notes.

Staff movements

With great pleasure we announce that the Statistics Division of ESCAP is finally fully staffed after a long period with posts vacant. We would like to share with our readers our warm welcome to our new colleagues:

  • Ms Selma Guven  joined the Statistical Development Section as Statistician, effective 18 October 1999.
    Ms Guven joined the Division after 24 years of working experience with the State Institute of Statistics in Turkey, where she was head of Environment Statistics Division for the last ten years. Ms Guven will initially focus her activities in the field of environment statistics.
  • Mr Blaise Ehou joined the Statistical Information Services Section as Statistical Database Administrator, effective 22 November 1999.

    Mr Ehou worked for several ministries in Canada and in Eurostat at the European Community. His experience spans statistics, economics and computer science fields. Mr Ehou's primary area of work with ESCAP will be on database development and maintenance.
  • Mr Joel Jere joined the Statistical Development Section as Statistician, effective 07 December 1999.

    Mr Jere comes to ESCAP from the Southern Africa Development Community, where he worked as Commonwealth statistical expert. Earlier he had been working with the Malawi National Statistical Common Service. Mr Jere takes on responsibility for a broad range of economic statistics.
Publications released by the Statistics Division
  • Statistical Indicators for Asia and the Pacific, Volume XXIX, No.3, September 1999
  • Selected Proceedings of the Seminar on Statistics on Trade  in Services, Bangkok
  • ESCAP Comparisons of Real Gross Domestic Product and Purchasing Power Parities
Missions of ESCAP Statistics Division Staff

Mr Andrew J. Flatt, Director, Statistics Division, undertook missions to:

  • Tokyo (6-8 October): To represent ESCAP at the 5th session, held at the Institute's Headquarters, of the SIAP Governing Board;
  • Ahmedabad (4-11 December): Together with Ms Heidi R. Arboleda, Regional Adviser on National Accounts, Ms Carmelita N. Ericta, Expert on Gender Statistics, and Ms Kesarin Roonrungmanirat, Associate Statistician, to service the second meeting of the Regional Resource Group on Integrating Paid and Unpaid Work, and to organize and service the seminar on time use surveys.

Ms Heidi R. Arboleda, Regional Adviser on National Accounts, visited the following countries:

  • Viet Nam (10-23 October): To provide advice on various aspects of the 1993 SNA and to serve as a training expert;
  • Lao PDR (1-7 November): To provide advice on various aspects of the 1993 SNA and to serve as a training expert at a training workshop on the compilation of the 1993 SNA in Vientiane;
  • Myanmar (8-19 November): To provide advice on various aspects of the 1993 SNA and to serve as a training expert.

Mr Nuri M. Ozsever, ESCAP Regional Adviser on Population Data Processing and Database Management with the UNFPA/CST in Bangkok, visited the following countries:

  • Lao PDR (26-30 October): To assist the Lao Youth Union (LYU) and the National Statistical Center (NSC) in developing data processing and tabulation plans for the Reproductive Health Survey for Adolescents and Young People;
  • China (15-19 November): To assist the Ministry of Health to develop a framework for data entry and analysis of the RTI/STD survey results;
  • Cambodia (5-14 December): To assist the National Institute of Statistics (NIS) in conducting workshop on the PopMap application and dissemination.

Ms Luisa T. Engracia, ESCAP Regional Adviser on Population Data Processing and Database Management with the UNFPA/CST in Kathmandu, undertook missions as follows:

  • Bangkok (12-20 October): To participate and act as a resource person at the Workshop on Application of New Technology to Population Data;
  • Tajikistan (18-25 November): To conduct the second phase of training on data processing for the staff of the Population Studies Centre.
Visitors to the Statistics Division
  1. Mr David Bain, Project Manager, National Accounts Branch, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Belconne
  2. Mr Tony Johnson, Principal Research Officer, National Accounts Research, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Belconnen
  3. Mr Chamnong Paungpook, Policy and Plan Analyst, National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB), Bangkok
  4. Ms Sivalai Vararuth, NESDB, Bangkok
  5. Ms Jindarat Srikam, NESDB, Bangkok
  6. Ms Supattra Cherdchuchai, NESDB, Bangkok
  7. Mr Maurice Clapisson, Evaluation Officer, Central Evaluation Unit, Office of Internal Oversight Services, United Nations , New York
  8. Dr Jadamba, WHO Liaison Officer, Office of the WHO Liaison Officer with ESCAP, Bangkok
  9. Ms Rosanita Serrano, Programme Coordinator, UNDP Asia Pacific Gender Equality Network (APGEN), Manila
  10. Ms Carolyn Hannan, Principal Social Affairs Officer, Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York
  11. Mr Richard Roberts, Chief, International Trade Statistics Branch, Statistics Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York

   
Copyright (c) 2013 ESCAP  |  Legal Notice