Graphic of 3D bar charts depicting international signs of persons with disabilities

Workshop on Improving Disability Data for Policy Use
23-26 September 2003, Bangkok, Thailand

UN ESCAP Statistics Division
 Main| Programme| Materials| Bangkok| WorldEnable home
Programme : Presentation on 23 September 2003

Highlights of Current Disability Statistics Data Collection in the ESCAP Region

Text version of a Powerpoint Presentation
Presented by UN ESCAP on 23 September 2003, 10:30am


Slide 1

Highlights of Current Disability Statistics Data Collection in the ESCAP Region


2

Disability data comes from

  • Surveys (17)
  • Censuses (9)
  • Administrative records (15)

3

Surveys : Date of Last Data Collection

Year Frequency
Before 2000 2 (China, Viet Nam)
2000 1 (Indonesia, Japan)
2001 3 (Thailand, NZ, Japan)
2002 4 (Thailand, Philippines, India, Afghanistan)
2003 5 (Australia, Kyrgyz Republic, Cambodia (2), Fiji)
Not Reported 2 (Japan, Kyrgyz Republic)

4

Surveys : Periodicity

  • Ad hoc basis
  • Large variability in time between surveys

5

Surveys : Who uses the information

  • Governments
  • NGOs
  • Academic researchers

6

Surveys: Were international standards used?

  • ICIDH / ICF was used in some countries
    • Thailand, New Zealand, Australia, Cambodia
  • No international standard was used
    • Japan, Indonesia, China
  • Most countries did not reply

7

Surveys : Sample size

  • Lots of variability (from 250 households in Kyrgyz Republic to 369,816 households (1,579,314 persons) in China)
    • Different objectives
    • Different budgets/costs

8

Surveys : Response Rate

  • Many countries did not respond to this
  • Typical rates between 70% and 100% were reported

9

Surveys : How Many Disability Questions

  • Between 1 and 70 (Thailand's extensive Disability Survey)
    • Depending on focus of survey

10

Surveys :
Examples of Quality Control Mentioned

  • Pretest of Questionnaire
  • Pilot test of Survey
  • Interviewer and Supervisor Training
  • Computer Checks and Edits
  • Contact Letters
  • Non-response follow up

11

Censuses : Date of Last Data Collection

Country / Census Years
Philippines 1995, 2000
Malaysia 2000
Iran 1986, 1996
Indonesia /Population Census 1980
Indonesia / Podes 2002
Indonesia / P4B 2003
India 2001
Fiji 1996

12

Censuses : Response Rates

  • Near 100% in most censuses
    • Due to legal obligation to participate
  • Indonesia mentions 90-95% response rate in unstable areas

13

Censuses : How Many Questions

  • Typically 1 to 3
    • Example: The Philippines, for example, when asking about all the members of a household, had two basic disability questions:
      Does ______ have any physical or mental disability?
      What type of disability does ______ have?

14

Administrative Registers : How Often are They Updated

  • Ad hoc, infrequently
  • Annually

15

Administrative Registers : Coverage

  • Not as good as surveys and censuses
    • disabled Indonesians who sign up for government housing or Malaysians admitted for treatment for their disability
  • Self-selection

16

Administrative Registers :
Examples of What is Collected

  • Labor force status
  • Educational achievements
  • Number of institutional houses providing specific care and rehabilitation for disabled
  • Amount of social services aimed at disabled

17

Administrative Registers :
How are They Updated

  • Paper
  • Paper and Electronically: Only Australia reports a trend toward a computer based updating system

18

Conclusion

  • Surveys: quality with coverage and details
  • Censuses: good coverage but infrequent, costly, and superficial for disability stats
  • Admin registers: inexpensive, very partial coverage

Return to top


Copyright (c) 2003 UNESCAP
Last Updated 12/11/2003. Contact: stat.unescap@un.org