Just over 4.2 billion people live in the
Asia-Pacific region in 2010, constituting
61% of the world’s population. Asia-Pacific
population growth rates have declined from
1.5% in the early 1990s to 1.0% in 2010 due
to declining birth rates and a stabilization in
death rates over the last two decades. These
totals however hide wide variations between
countries of the region.
Population growth
Population growth in the region has been steadily
declining over the last two decades. In 2010
the Asia-Pacific region’s annual population
growth rate averaged at 1.0%, while the world
population growth rate, which has been falling
at a slower rate, averaged slightly higher (at 1.2%)
over a similar period.
Figure I.1 – Index of population, Asia-Pacific
subregions, 1990 to 2010

Trends in population growth vary by subregion.
Population growth rates have been decreasing in
almost all subregions since 2000. The decline has
been slightly faster in South-East Asia and in
South and South-West Asia. The rates have also fallen in East and North-East Asia since 2000;
although they have remained relatively constant
since 2003. The lowest figure in the Asia-Pacific
region is that of North and Central Asia,
a subregion where the population growth rate
dropped to an average of -0.1% between 1990
and 2000, but subsequently rose to 0.3% in
2010.
Differences in population growth rates by
country are greater than by subregion level. Four
countries experienced a negative annual average
population growth between 2005 and 2010:
Georgia, Niue, Northern Mariana Islands and
the Russian Federation.
In the two most populous countries of the region
(China and India), the growth rates fell to 0.5%
and 1.2%, respectively, in 2010. Pacific island
developing economies currently record the
highest average annual population growth rates
in the Asia-Pacific region. Growth rates over
2.0% were found in Afghanistan; Macao, China;
Papua New Guinea; Singapore; Solomon Islands;
Timor-Leste; and Vanuatu.
Birth
The population growth trends are largely
a consequence of declining birth rates across the
region. Countries with the most rapid declines
in the crude birth rate (CBR) include Bhutan,
Cambodia, the Lao People’s Democratic
Republic, Maldives, and Singapore with declines
exceeding 40% from the 1990-1995 average to
2010. In 2010, the CBR was highest (over 35)
in the two countries with the highest population
growth rates: Afghanistan and Timor-Leste.
The lowest birth rates were found in East and
North-East Asia, with only Mongolia exceeding
15. Japan and Hong Kong, China had the
region’s lowest CBRs at less than 9.
Death
In East and North-East Asia the crude death rate
(CDR) rose from 6.9 in 1990-1995 to 7.5 in
2005-2010. In North and Central Asia the CDR ranged from 12 (1990-1995) to a peak of 13
(2000-2005) then fell to 12 in 2005-2010. In all
other subregions, the CDR decreased between
1990-1995 and 2005-2010. At the country level,
most countries show rates between 5 and 10. The only country with a CDR above 15 is
Afghanistan.
In theory, falling death rates, especially at the
earlier stages of the demographic transition, relate
to higher life expectancy at birth. However, age
structure also plays a significant role in death
rates. As populations age, death rates may again
increase.
Fertility
CBRs relate closely to the total fertility rate
(TFR). For the Asia-Pacific region the average
TFR for 2010 was 2.1, which equates
approximately to the replacement level. This TFR
is similar to that of Latin America and the
Caribbean and North America, though
substantially higher than that of Europe and
lower than that of Africa. In East and North-East
Asia and North and Central Asia, the TFR is 1.6
and 1.8 respectively (well below replacement).
In the long run that could portend population
decline, unless high levels of in-migration are
experienced.
In South-East Asia and the Pacific, TFRs are just
above the regional aggregate figure (at 2.2 and
2.4 respectively), while in South and South-West
Asia the figure is 2.7. Although South and South-
West Asia has the highest TFR, this subregion has
many countries which have experienced large
declines in TFR, such as Bangladesh, Bhutan,
the Islamic Republic of Iran, Maldives, and
Nepal. In the South-East Asian countries of
Cambodia and Lao People’s Democratic
Republic, large declines have also occurred.
Pacific island developing economies have a high
TFR at 3.7 and while the TFR has been falling,
the decline has happened more slowly than in
other subregions.
Figure I.2 – Adolescent fertility rate, Asia and
the Pacific, annual averages 1995-2000 and
2005-2010

The adolescent fertility rate also varies
significantly by region and subregion. The
adolescent fertility rate in Asia and the Pacific was
45.2 for 2005-2010, which is less than half of the rate in Africa and almost triple the rate in
Europe. In East and North-East Asia the rate
has risen from 6.5 in 1995-2000 to 8.0 in
2005-2010. In South-East Asia and the Pacific
there have been moderate declines in adolescent
fertility of around 5% and 10%, respectively, between 1995-2000 and 2005-2010. South and
South-West Asia and North and Central Asia
have seen more dramatic declines of more than
25% (for South and South-West Asia the figure
was 106 in 1995-2000 and 75 in 2005-2010; for
North and Central Asia the figure was 37 in
1995-2000 and 28 in 2005-2010). Afghanistan
and Nepal were the only two countries in the
region with an adolescent fertility rate exceeding
100 in 2005-2010.
Sex ratios
The child sex ratio, which represents the number
of boys per 100 girls, depends on combination
of the sex ratio at birth and infant/child mortality
rates. In general, more boys are born than girls,
yielding a natural sex ratio of 105; however,
mortality among boys is generally greater than
that of girls, and thus by the age of 20 parity is
achieved. In contrast, the child sex ratio in the
Asia-Pacific region, 110, is much higher than the
natural sex ratio and higher than any other region
of the world. In other regions of the world, the
sex ratio has remained relatively consistent
between 102 and 106, but in Asia and the Pacific
it has slowly and steadily risen from 106 in 1990
to 110 in 2010 with high variability across
countries. The average for East and North-East
Asia, 119, is the highest of all subregions.
Turning to the population sex ratio, which
represents the number of males per 100 females,
the Asian and Pacific average of 104 is
considerably higher than other regions of the
world, which hover just below 100. It has not
changed over the past two decades; however, the
increasing child sex ratio in Asia and the Pacific
could translate into an increase in the population
sex ratio in the upcoming years. Currently, in
South-East Asia and the Pacific the figures are
generally close to parity, while in North and
Central Asia they are lower than 100 in all
countries, under 90 in Armenia (where there has
been a large decrease over the past two decades)
and Georgia, and as low as 86 in the Russian
Federation. In South and South-West Asia and
East and North-East Asia (the subregions with
the highest populations), the sex ratio in 2010
was at 105 and 106, respectively. Life expectancy Currently, life expectancy in the Asia-Pacific
region is highly variable, with ranges from 48
(Afghanistan) to 86 (Japan) years for women and
47 (Afghanistan) to 79 (Japan) years for men in
2005-2010. Figure I.3 – Life expectancy at birth by sex, Asia
and the Pacific, annual averages 2005-2010

Within East and North-East Asia and the Pacific,
most countries have high life expectancies (over
70 for both men and women) which are lower
for men than women. The situation in South-
East Asia is somewhat similar, yet with lower
figures. In South and South-West Asia the life
expectancies are generally lower (many countries
below 70 for both men and women) with near
parity between men and women. In North and
Central Asia, life expectancies range from 69 to
77 for women and 60 to 70 for men.
Population age structure
The demographic changes discussed previously
shape population structures. The proportion of
children in the total population in the Asia-
Pacific region has fallen steadily from 33% in
1990 to 25% in 2010. This decline has been
greater than that in Latin America and the
Caribbean and considerably greater than that in
Africa. Significant variations exist within Asia and
the Pacific – in 2010, East and North-East Asia
and North and Central Asia were both at
approximately 19%; while in the Pacific and in
South-East Asia the figures are 24% and 27%,
respectively. In South and South-West Asia the
figure is a fair deal higher at 31%. Country
variations exist across Asia and the Pacific, with
the highest proportions being in Afghanistan
(46%), Timor-Leste (46%), the Solomon Islands
(40%), Papua New Guinea (39%) and Vanuatu
(38%).
Figure I.4 – Index of elderly proportion,
Asia-Pacific subregions, 1990 to 2010
The proportion of elderly (aged 65 and above)
has been steadily increasing (at a similar rate to
that in Latin America and the Caribbean) going
from 5.3% in 1990 to 7.0% in 2010. In Africa
the proportion was 3.5% with relatively little
change over time. The figures in East and
North-East Asia are 9.5%, in North and Central
Asia, 10% and in the Pacific, 11%; while in
South-East Asia and South and South-West Asia,
the figures are 5.6% and 4.9%, respectively.
With regard to changes over time, the figure for
East and North-East Asia has risen most rapidly.
In many of the countries of that subregion and
to a certain extent those in others, especially in
South-East Asia, population ageing is an
increasingly relevant issue. |