Site map | Search | Contact Us

ESCAP home

Population and Rural
and Urban Development


Human Settlements

Urban Poverty

Habitat Agenda

Governance

Local Government in Asia
and the Pacific


Australia

Land

Women in Local Government

Living in Asian Cities

Logotri


Email Webmaster | Legal Notice


Local Government in Asia and the Pacific:
A Comparative Study

Country paper: Australia

  Description of the Country
  Evolution of Local Government
  Local Government Categories
  Local Government Functions
  Local Government Finances
  Personnel Systems
  Central-Local Links
  Public Participation
  The Way Ahead
  References
  Further Reading

Local Government Finances

Local government is not a big player in the public sector. Compared to outlays by local government in other countries own-purpose outlays by Australian councils in relation to state and national governments are relatively small. Local government own-purpose outlays comprise just 5 compared with 53 per cent and 42 per cent respectively for state and Commonwealth. As pointed out above, when comparing Australian local government with that in other countries it must be remembered that functions such as health, education, public housing and policing are all predominantly state and/or Commonwealth responsibilities. Although local government's proportion of the national outlays may be small the sums involved are not insignificant. Consolidated outlays by purpose indicate the scale of activity and the spread between the various functions. The relative dominance of providing physical infrastructure can be seen in the three large spending areas of health and community amenities, recreation and culture and transport and communications.

Local government receives 16 per cent of its revenue from Commonwealth and 7 per cent from state governments. Funds flow from these two external sources in the form of grants and special purpose payments. Grants are made primarily by central agencies (those determining policy and funding); firstly as Commonwealth Financial Assistance Grants (FAG) from the Commonwealth, secondly distributed within the state by State Local government Grant Commissions (LGGC). Special purpose payments are those flowing to local government from the line agencies (those delivering programmes) at both Commonwealth and state levels. Road funding through state road authorities comprises a significant proportion of Special Purpose Payments (SPPs) made to local government. In a significant step the government linked Commonwealth funding of local government to one per cent of Commonwealth income tax receipts in 1976, This was to rise in subsequent years, but the fiscal restraints of the subsequent government resulted in this link being dropped in favour of the present grant system where payments to local government are linked to payments to state governments.

Figure 5. Composition of Total Public Sector Own-Purpose Outlays 1993-1994

Composition of Total Public Sector

Source: McNeill 1997:29

Table 9. Consolidated Outlays by Purpose of Local Governments

Purpose 1990-1991 1991-1992 1992-1993 1993-1994 1994-1995
$m $m $m $m $m
General public services (includes staff costs) 1,476 1,552 1,492 1,479 1,323
Public order and safety 116 120 127 190 222
Education 36 38 45 31 35
Health (includes health inspection services, immunization) 154 166 154 174 215
Social security and welfare (includes children's play centres) 311 358 409 450 485
Housing and community amenities (includes land use planning and development control) 1,331 1,314 1,418 1,400 1,508
Recreation and culture 1,137 1,144 1,338 1,424 1,537
Fuel and energy 405 324 391 23 (1) 4 (1)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing 16 17 16 12 13
Mining, manufacturing and construction 117 115 112 96 128
Transport and communications (includes roads, bridges, etc.) 1,906 1,946 2,117 2,073 2,109
Other economic affairs 61 64 73 71 20
Other purposes 1,264 1,026 1,009 672 623
Total 8,329 8,183 8,702 8,096 8,223

Source: Government Financial Estimates (Australia 1996-1997);
(1) Responsibility for electricity distribution was for the most part removed from the jurisdiction of local government.

Table 10. Share of Outlays by Major Functions by Level of Government (1992-1993)

Categories Local
%
State & territory
%
Commonwealth
%
General public services 10.0 36.6 53.5
Defense -- -- 100.0
Public order and safety 2.2 84.4 12.4
Education 0.2 86.5 13.3
Health 0.7 51.6 47.8
Social security and welfare 0.9 7.3 91.8
Housing and community
amenities
36.1 60.8 3.0
Recreation and culture 35.2 39.3 25.6
Fuel and energy 1.6 59.1 39.3
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 0.5 57.3 42.2
Mining and mineral resources 21.4 36.2 42.4
Transport and communication 18.7 55.7 25.6

Source: McNeill 1997:36

Given the significant power they have over them state/territory governments inject minimal funds of their own into local governments. While the Commonwealth government provides more funds than the state governments, between them these higher levels of government contribute less than one quarter of direct local government income.

Table 11. Sources of Local government Revenue

Source of revenue Share (%)
Tax on immovable property 58
Fees 3
Fines 1
Net operating surplus of trading enterprises 6
Interest received 4
General purpose grants ex Commonwealth 13
Specific purpose grants ex Commonwealth 3
Special purpose grants ex states/territories 7
Other revenues 4
Total 100

Source: Gerritson & Osborn 1997:71

Accrual accounting has replaced traditional fund accounting. As Australian Accounting Standard No 27 (AAS27) has been adopted and incorporated in state local government legislation, councils have been required to move to the new accrual basis. For some councils the transition was relatively straightforward, some were operating on an accrual basis already. For others, particularly councils comfortable with the traditional fund accounting, the transition has demanded a steeper learning curve. More importantly, AAS27 introduced a new asset management regime. Local governments are now required to bring onto the balance sheet all physical assets under their control. Since 1992 buildings, parks, roads, utilities and communication networks are being brought progressively to account. This has involved councils in identification, classification, inventories, condition assessment, valuation and depreciation of previously unrecorded community infrastructure involving substantial demand on council resources. Once this task is completed policy implications will follow. In New South Wales, for example, in their annual reports councils are required to report on the condition of the physical assets, gaps between that and satisfactory levels, how the gaps will be bridged and how the assets will be maintained at the satisfactory level. Under present funding constraints, particularly where property rates and taxes are pegged, many councils will be unable to bridge gaps and sustain higher maintenance spending. Another looming issue is when in a few years time depreciation of these assets begins to show up in the balance sheets creating significant deficits. Councils may find their communities questioning their fiscal responsibility when presented with such balance sheets.

Personnel Systems in Local Government

In 1994 local government employed 159,000 people, representing about 10 per cent of public sector employment but less than 3 per cent of the total wage and salary earners.

Table 12. Employed Wage and Salary Earners (May 1994)

Sector NSW VIC QLD SA WA TAS NT ACT AUST
'000 '000 '000 '000 '000 '000 '000 '000 '000
Private 1471.9 1098.6 682.9 331.6 383.6 96.1 36.0 56.3 4156.9
Commonwealth 115.1 87.1 44.7 24.8 22.1 7.6 3.8 54.5 359.8
State 344.7 242.3 191.3 103.8 117.3 34.0 15.9 20.0 1069.3
Local 53.1 44.8 33.8 9.1 13.3 3.9 1.2 - 159.2
Total 513.0 374.2 269.8 137.7 152.7 45.5 20.9 74.5 1588.3
Total 1984.9 1472.8 952.7 469.3 536.2 141.6 56.9 130.8 5745.2

Source: ABS (6248.0)

Employment statistics indicate that 63 per cent of local government staff are male and 37 per cent female, although in 1996 in Victoria the number of female employees exceeded the number of males. The occupational characteristics of local government are changing. Occupations dealing with people increased while the numbers of staff using plant and equipment decreased. Changes between the censuses of 1986 and 1991 are shown in Table 13. Results from the 1996 census are not available at the time of writing although the trend is expected to have continued.

Table 13. Change in Local Government Occupations (1986 to 1991)

Occupation category 1986 1991 Change %
Managers and administrators 3884 7208 85.6%
Professionals 12,104 14,960 23.6%
Para-professionals 13,499 18,117 34.2%
Tradepersons 21,404 18,932 -11.5%
Clerks 23,493 22,654 -3.6%
Sales and personal service workers 5,089 10,254 101.5%
Plant and machine operators, drivers 25,028 23,058 -7.9%
Labourers & related workers 36,020 28,344 -21.3%
Inadequately describer 2,143 3,238 -
Not stated 945 620 -
Total 143,6098 147,385 2.6%

Source: Osborn, R, ACRLGS, University of Canberra

Many of these changes are outcomes from Australia's microeconomic reform pursued by all three spheres of government. "Microeconomic reform is mainly concerned with removing market impediments which discourage or prevent input resources (...) being used in the most efficient manner or which limit the flexibility and responsiveness of both workers and enterprise" (Aulich 1977). For its part, local government has worked to reform workplace procedures and practices, introduce enterprise bargaining in the workforce, improve regulatory systems and upgrade strategic and financial management practices and service delivery. Increasing use of contracting out to the private sector, impacts of technology and changing patterns of work all contribute to these trends.

Victorian local authorities, in particular, have been forced to competitively tender many of their services. To operate in this competitive environment, local authorities have established internal business units that lodge tenders to perform work for their council in competition with external organizations. It has not been uncommon for an external contractor to win over the internal business unit. Not all external contractors are from the private sector, nor are they always Australian organizations. In several instances the winning contractor has been a business unit of a New Zealand council.

Many of these changes have not been universally welcomed, such as the downsizing of the local government workforce. Some have argued that withdrawal from service delivery by local authorities has enhanced local business opportunities. Others have lamented the impact that workforce downsizing has had, especially in smaller communities (Aulich 1997). Whether these changes have generated costs savings has been debated vigorously. "Private sector proponents argue that there are indisputable cost savings to be had from contracting out government services and figures as high as 20 per cent have been frequently cited" (Aulich 1997). Preliminary investigations undertaken by the Public Sector Research Centre at the University of New South Wales (Paddon 1991) highlights a number of weaknesses in the studies from which figures of this kind have been derived and draws attention to a series of hidden costs that have often not been taken into account (Aulich 1997)

Workplace reform

Recent workplace reform began with a National Review of Local Government Labour Markets. An early outcome was a far-reaching deregulation of employment by removing legislative restrictions attached to local government positions. Senior staff positions were opened to appointment on merit without legislative or professional constraint. Engineers, for example, could be and were, appointed as CEOs of councils without having to first obtain the previously mandatory Town Clerks' Certificate. Equally, a lawyer could, for instance, be appointed to head a technical team of professional engineers. Contract employment was also introduced for senior staff, usually for five-year terms. This aimed to introduce new blood into what was regarded as a closed shop. Some state have introduced an American style council/city manager model with council responsible for policy direction and overall funding - a central agency role - and the CEO or general manager responsible to engage staff and manage the operations of council - a line agency role. As an instance, in New South Wales within the first year after an election the incoming council must adopt an organization structure and ensure a general manager is in place. The general manager in turn is responsible for staffing and running the organization.

In general terms Australian local government staff are industrially aware and organized. Considerable work has been done recently to reform industrial rules by consolidation of the many different and outdated awards and classifications. Negotiations between the industrial unions and employers (councils) have introduced fewer broad-banded awards to cover local government employees. An emerging feature is enterprise agreements negotiated between employees and council in individual local authorities. In both cases employees are afforded the protection of the Commonwealth Industrial Relations Commission. Employees, other than contracted senior staff, are provided with employer/employee contributed superannuating schemes and enjoy typical public service conditions of employment: four weeks annual leave, sick leave, maternity leave, long service leave. Many local authorities encourage education and training and some provide financial assistance in meeting educational expenses.

Education and training

Australia has no central strategy or programme of education and training for local government. In the early 1990s a national system of industry training boards was established to implement competency based training programmes. Until 1996 the industry had a National Local Government Training Board and subsidiary State Training Committees. The Commonwealth government also introduced a Training Guarantee Levy whereby employees were required to either allocate funds for training or pay an equivalent amount in tax. For a short period it seemed training in local government, like all other sections of Australian industry, would be coordinated and funded adequately. The levy system was abandoned in 1995 and the industry training boards diminished in 1996. No state has a compulsory training scheme for either staff or elected members. What training is provided is spasmodic and uncoordinated. Education and training is now left entirely to the discretion of local authorities, the associations of local authorities and professional institutes.

Central-Local Links

When describing local government within the Australian Federation, it has been suggested often that the Commonwealth has all the money, the states have all the power and local government has all the problems. The comment may be simplistic but it is, in essence, true. Power and control does not flow down from the national government, through the state, to local government. Power and control over local government rest with the respective state Parliaments. Wresting this away from the states has long been an issue for local government. So far the main strategy has been to seek recognition in the Australian Constitution, aiming to strengthen local democracy by recognizing local governments and granting them broad competence powers to respond to local needs. Such recognition requires a national referendum; one attempt in 1988 was unsuccessful but another case is being mounted within the broader context of the current debate about Australia changing to a republic.

Within this present structure of control, each State Parliament has promulgated specific local government legislation. The respective acts set out the form, roles and functions of local councils. Administration of the legislation in each jurisdiction is the responsibility of state government line agencies. In some states these are full government departments with specific ministerial control, in others local government forms part only of a broader ministerial portfolio. The status of local government ministries and agencies is generally low. The government Minister with the local government portfolio is not always a full member of Cabinet. While prescriptive control over local government has been reduced in the last decade, state governments retain ultimate control through their power to dismiss councils. This power was demonstrated most dramatically in the recent amalgamation of councils in Victoria when the Victorian government dismissed all two hundred councils before forcing restructure of the system into the present seventy-eight councils. For the most part, state powers are exercised less dramatically, being used to deal with specific problems of mal-administration in individual councils. In recent years the absolute power of the Minister to dismiss a council has been reduced by the provision, at least in some states, that a public inquiry must first be held. For its part, local government continues to press for a full local referendum as the only basis for dismissal of a council. At the national level the status of local government waxes and wanes depending on the policy priorities of the incumbent government. Where control is exercised it is done through intermediary institutions such as the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) and the Local Government Ministers Conference (LGMC), or more coercively through tying Commonwealth funding grants to desired policy outcomes. The current Commonwealth government has intimated it may link its Financial Assistance Grants (FAG) to evidence of local government structural reform.

Extent of Public Participation

In addition to basic democracy and the electoral system, three factors influence participation of the community in local government: population, geographic size and level of local activity. If population were the only factor, with so many local authorities with small populations, more than one third with less than 3000 people, direct participation would be expected. Local politicians with small constituencies are obviously able to more directly represent their electorates. In this century while population has increased the number of local authorities has decreased resulting in less direct personal representation.

These averages are distorted by the urbanization factor; most population growth has taken place in the urban areas. Many rural local populations have fallen over time. The immense physical size of most of the small authorities mitigates against direct participation. However, levels of local activity in many small communities are not great, although they are important. For some isolated rural councils the dominant activity is road maintenance with few other council services and activities. Declining population of the rural areas and towns is an important issue for local government.

There are no mandatory requirements that a local government electorate be subdivided into small areas called wards. Many local electorates function on a ward basis but it is a matter for local communities. A referendum may be needed, but it is up to the community to decide whether to elect their local government representatives from the community as a whole or divide it into wards. A typical ward-council may have four wards with three councilors elected for each ward, a total of twelve. In a non-ward council twelve councilors would be elected for the area as a whole. Wards offer formal electoral subdivisions of local government areas. Some areas operate precinct committees as a mechanism for involving the community in local governance. While these have no legislative status, where they operate well they are accepted as legitimate participants. Some councils provide administrative services for the precinct committees to function. These work best where there is community support for participative democracy and generally in areas with significant change and choices occurring. Local government legislation makes provision for the appointment of special purpose committees to manage such things as sports grounds, community halls, public gardens, art galleries and the like. These committees may have delegated authority to manage the particular activity or facility but they remain accountable directly to the council.

Local authorities are required by law to exhibit publicly a range of plans and policy documents and seeks participation prior to adoption. Land use plans, strategic management plans, financial plans and development policies are examples. Most states have some form of "neighbour notification" requirements where owners of adjoining properties must be notified of any changes to land use or building proposals for adjoining properties. Provision exists for the affected neighbour to lodge an objection to council or to take the matter further to the courts. With slight variations between states, local government legislation provides opportunities for direct participation in the affairs of councils. Faced with an issue a council may initiate a poll of citizens or even a referendum. The outcomes of a poll are not binding on the council but the outcome of a referendum is. Despite its promotion citizen initiation of polls and referendums does not currently operate in Australia. Members of the community may put their case before council at any time, either directly to a local politician or by way of petition to the council or through the media. Local government affairs are covered in national and local newspapers. Many local authorities commence their meetings with an open question time - normally for about one-hour, during which the public is free to address questions to the councilors. It is common for a developer seeking approval for a project to attend a council committee meeting to explain the proposal. Committees of council are less formal and not binding on the full council. Having spoken to the committee the applicant may also be granted permission to explain the proposal to full council and answer questions.

The Way Ahead

The Australian Local Government Association and its state/territory counterparts form the key body representing local authorities before the higher levels of government. Representatives of the councils meet in a National Assembly each November to agree on a National Agenda for Australian Local Government. By setting out its National Agenda, local government seeks a fuller and more productive partnership with Commonwealth, state and territory governments. The main items of the 1996 National Agenda provide both a conclusion to this paper and point the way forward for local government in Australia. The Agenda is structured under eleven headings reflecting the main issues being addressed by local government. These are listed below as strategic actions or principles to be adopted.

Local democracy

Recognition of local government in the Australian Constitution will continue to be sought. Diversity in local communities should be both expected and valued as a strength of local democracy. For effective local democracy there is a need for broad competence powers to respond to local needs. Restructuring of local government should only be effected through extensive public engagement and referendum. Local government must endorse and support the Council of Aboriginal Reconciliation and pursue partnerships with Indigenous Australians.

Finance and taxation

It is essential to correct the restrictive and regressive nature of local government's revenue base and the vertical fiscal imbalance in current financial sharing. Local government must have greater flexibility in determining sources of local revenue, freedom to undertake business enterprises and commercial activities and a guaranteed real terms share equivalent to 1 per cent of Commonwealth general taxation revenue. Revenue sharing grants should remain untied and specific purpose grants should continue. Funding must take into account extra costs of service delivery in rural and remote communities. Councils should have access to a realistic range of loan funds and sources of borrowings.

Micro-economic reform

Local government is committed to partnerships with other spheres of government in achieving further micro-economic reform, especially reform of regulatory. Cooperation and resource sharing between councils should be pursued. Councils should continue to support implementation of the National Competition Policy and national benchmarking systems.

Economic and regional development

Economic and regional development should be fostered through a range of measures, seeking balanced national development. Provision of appropriate and affordable housing should be pursued as a key element of regional development. There should be further major investment in strategic infrastructure, including roads, increasing the viability and competitiveness of existing industry and encouragement of new industry to establish in regional Australia.

Transport and infrastructure

Ensure continued recognition that provision of roads and other transport and community infrastructure is one of local government's most important responsibilities. The national objective must be a safe, efficient, integrated, accessible and environmentally sustainable transport system - roads, rail, air and sea - that meets the economic and social needs of every Australian community. There should be a planned national approach to provision of information technology infrastructure.

People and community

Continue to promote Integrated Local Area Planning, integrating provision of housing with that of transport and other essential community services. Stronger links are essential between the various forms of health and community care, public health, health promotion, community safety, leisure, sport and recreation, cultural development and environmental management. There should be considerable financial and resource support for home and community care, family and children's services and youth. Councils must build effective partnerships with other stakeholders in local cultural development. Councils have a key role in facilitating community-based safety and crime prevention strategies.

Environment

Equal partnerships are necessary between all spheres of government in development and implementation of national environmental policy. Principles of ecologically sustainable development must be supported. Local government should accept responsibility to ensure traditional owners of land are consulted and actively involved in environmental planning and management processes. Total catchment management, joint efforts to maintain quality of water resources for human use and as part of environmental systems, waste minimization and recycling are all environmental management strategies to be pursued. Local government should cooperate with other spheres of government to ensure effective controls on greenhouse gas emissions, encourage energy conservation and alternative energy use.

Urban affairs

Principles of integration should be applied to local and regional planning for urban areas. Tripartite cooperation between the three spheres of government should be sought in the development of area-based urban strategies which reflect integrated planning principles and which adopt holistic approaches to the needs of urban communities.

Rural affairs

It is essential that local government continues to support and promote policies aimed at safeguarding the continued viability and opportunities for development of Australia's rural regions and communities.

Inter-government relations

Local government is committed to necessary processes of change to strengthen local government's position as third tier of government. It supports continuation of and seeks participation in the Council of Australian Governments; it seeks equal partnership in intergovernmental processes affecting those activities for which local government carries legislative and financial responsibilities. Agreements or protocols should be negotiated setting out agreed objectives, roles, responsibilities, decision-making processes, procedures and financial/administrative arrangements.

International links

Australian local government reaffirms support for the World-Wide Declaration of Local Self-government adopted by IULA, continues to seek closer relations with local governments in other countries, particularly in the Asian Pacific region and wherever possible offers assistance to emerging systems of local government in the region and elsewhere.

Go to References and Further Reading
Go to the beginning of the document