| VI. QUALITY
OF CARE AND TARGET-FREE APPROACH Family Planning Programmes
FOR FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMMES
Atiqur Rahman Khan, Tan Boon-Ann and
Suman Mehta *
Introduction
Client expectations have always been the main criteria
for the interpretation of what quality of care should
be. However, unless people have a clear perception
of their own rights, their expectations from services
are also likely to be limited. In most Asian and Pacific
countries, quality of care has been seen as services
rendered by technically competent providers in well-equipped
facilities - a connotation which fits better as quality
of services rather than quality of care. Emphasis
was implicitly placed more on the technical aspects
of services, referring to issues such as whether (i)
clients are properly screened for contraindications;
(ii) the clinical procedures are technically correct;
(iii) aseptic precautions are taken; and (iv) services
are provided in well-equipped facilities. From these
perspectives, quality of service, or what is seen
as good service, would generally imply adequate technical
competence of the providers and availability of facilities.
Client perspectives, especially client-provider relationships,
were neglected (Donabedian, 1988). Improved performance
of family planning programmes, in quantitative terms,
has raised concern about improving quality of care.
1. Quality of care: definition and principles
Despite a widely accepted framework for quality of
care, there is some disagreement on an acceptable
definition. One author states that quality of care
can be defined by the way the clients are treated
by the system, or the actual process of care-giving,
and by the focus on the client's or user's perspectives
of services (Hull, 1994).
Another author (Abou-Zahr, 1994) has tried to simplify
the perception of quality of care as follows:
Doing the right thing
Doing things right
Doing things at the right time
Doing things with the right attitude
Notably, these definitions were proposed after the
development of the quality-of-care framework by Judith
Bruce (1989). Hence, they incorporate a broader concept
of care. However, it is still necessary for changing
trends in the perceptions and expectations of men
and women regarding broader reproductive health services
to be studied before quality of care can be defined
more appropriately.
2. Quality of care: framework
A comprehensive quality-of-care framework was first
proposed by Judith Bruce. The framework described
main programme elements relevant to improvement of
the quality of care in the context of family planning,
which include the following (Bruce, 1989):
- Choice of methods
- Information given to users
- Technical competence
- Interpersonal relations
- Mechanisms to encourage continuity
- Appropriate constellations of services
The framework emphasized previously neglected aspects
of clients' perspectives, implying that interpersonal
client-provider interactions are equally important
in its application. It was accordingly acknowledged
that "the interpersonal process is the vehicle
by which technical care is implemented and on which
its success depends ... Privacy, confidentiality,
informed choice, concern, empathy, honesty, tact,
sensitivity--all these and more are virtues that the
interpersonal relationship is expected to have"
(Donabedian, 1988). Previously, the major focuses
of family planning programmes had been accessibility
and availability, demographic impact and clinical
operations. In contrast, the quality-of-care framework
focuses on individual clients and the services they
receive, especially in respect of the interpersonal
dimensions of care.
The framework provides for flexibility in that individual
programmes can apply different emphases on different
elements according to the maturity and priority of
the programme. Since the quality-of-care framework
is not a single standard and is applicable to varying
levels of standards, individual programmes can also
choose the standard of care they want to offer. Again,
although the framework originated from concerns to
improve quality of care in family planning services,
the underlying principles are applicable to a broader
spectrum of reproductive health.
3. Application of quality of care in programmes
A major constraint in the application of quality-of-care
strategies is an inadequate understanding of the relevant
issues, of which broader service options and freedom
of choice, discussed above, are integral components.
Notably, among the quality-of-care issues, the rationale
and objectives of interpersonal dimensions, especially
the need for unbiased information on all aspects of
services, including possible complications of method
use, are least recognized. In many countries, service
providers, especially those who are not sufficiently
trained in interpersonal communication, particularly
in target-driven situations, are influenced by a misbelief
that information on the negative aspects of contraceptives,
such as side effects and complications, may prevent
acceptance.
Two important factors that have affected quality
of care in the countries of the region are lack of
an appropriate strategy on quality of care and lack
of provider skills. For example, while the basic principles
of informed choice were neglected in several high-performing
countries (China, Indonesia and Viet Nam) for reasons
of method-linked priorities, they were not followed
in several low-performing countries (Cambodia, the
Lao People's Democratic Republic and Myanmar) because
of inadequate provider skills.
In general, the focus of contraceptive services in
most countries has been on methods, and not on clients.
Even research and studies on programme-effectiveness
have measured single-method continuation rates, not
all-method continuation rates. Little attention was
given to contraceptive switching patterns, use dynamics
and related factors. In many instances, provider skills
were also method-specific. Client perspectives relating
to counselling needs on method-switching practices
were also missing. Client follow-up systems were inadequate.
Follow-up systems, where they existed, were generally
method-oriented. Programmes followed users of different
methods, not individuals.
Some countries have their own interpretation and
meaning of quality of care. For example, some feel
that it is a Western concept and is meaningless where
access to basic services is lacking. Many see quality
of care as what is provided in clean and well-equipped
settings by well-trained personnel and, therefore,
mainly dependent on the availability of resources.
Despite an inadequate understanding of the quality-of-care
framework, there is both a growing interest in and
a positive attitude towards improving the quality
of care. In Indonesia it is believed that the quality-of-care
framework needs to be further built upon the existing
model to be applied to services at the community level
in the form of "clinics without walls" (Haryono
Suyono, 1994). Indonesia has also developed an exclusive
project designed to address the quality of care, together
with a shift in favour of a more "cafeteria-oriented"
approach of providing a broader choice. The project
also provides for greater cooperation among the various
agencies involved in reproductive health/family planning
services, mainly the Ministry of Health and the National
Family Planning Coordinating Board (BKKBN). Support
for similar projects is being considered in the Democratic
People's Republic of Korea and Mongolia. With a view
to developing a more quality-oriented service strategy
in the Philippines, a research study was conducted
to assess the quality of care and identify needs for
improvement (Osteria, 1996). Improvement in the quality
of care has also been a major thrust of a project
on strengthening the management and field implementation
of the family planning/reproductive health programme.
In Cambodia, the Lao People's Democratic Republic
and Viet Nam, training courses, curricula and training
manuals for trainees and trainers have been developed
in recent years which are more sensitive to quality-of-care
issues and show an increasing emphasis on the counselling
and interpersonal communication skills of providers.
In China, the new Programme for the Promotion of Family
Planning in China (1995-2000) recognizes the need
for improving the quality of family planning and reproductive
health services (China, 1995).
A. Rationales for family planning prior to the International
Conference on Population and Development
Family planning services, pioneered by some NGOs,
such as family planning associations, were initially
provided to meet unmet needs. Margaret Sanger's ideal
is the best example of the underlying rationale for
family `planning. However, organized large-scale government
programmes in nearly all countries of the Asian region
originated with population control as the intent.
For example, the family planning policy adopted by
Thailand in 1970 was clear in its enunciation to "support
voluntary family planning in order to resolve various
problems concerned with the very high rate of population
growth which constitute an important obstacle to the
economic and social development of the nation"
(Singh, 1994). Indonesia adopted an antinatalist policy
in 1967, by announcing that family planning would
be an integral part of the country's development programme
(ibid). China's family planning programme, driven
by the one-child population policy, was designed to
limit population growth (China, 1995). This policy
has resulted in a strong, target-oriented family planning
programme since 1980. In the Philippines, family planning
began in 1970, as a population control programme,
with the coordinating responsibility assigned to the
Commission on Population.
Many countries, simultaneously or subsequently, have
recognized the health benefits of family planning
and consequently reflected them in their policy statements
and structural organizations. For example, in the
Philippines, responsibility for family planning was
transferred to the Department of Health in 1988, thereby
making family planning essentially a health programme
(UNFPA, 1995b). The Philippine policy, representing
an example of non-coercion and individual rights in
family planning, appears to have been influenced by
the resolutions on reproductive rights adopted by
the World Population Conference held at Bucharest
in 1974 (United Nations, 1974).
B. Programme of Action of the International Conference
on Population and Development: new paradigm for family
planning
The Programme of Action of the Cairo Conference sets
individual rights as the rationale for family planning
services in its enunciation to enable couples and
individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number
and spacing of their children and to have the information
and means to do so and to ensure informed choices
and make available a full range of safe and effective
methods (paragraph 7. 12).
This principle clearly places individual desire and
childbearing preferences over demographic goals, thereby
making unmet need the main reason for the provision
of family planning. The Programme of Action states:
"Government goals for family planning should
be defined in terms of unmet needs for information
and services"(ibid.).
Simultaneously with a need-based approach to family
planning, the Programme of Action proposes the stabilization
of population growth rates and supports country demographic
objectives as the basis for development goals: "Demographic
goals, while legitimately the subject of government
development strategies, should not be imposed on family
planning providers in the form of targets or quotas
for the recruitment of clients" (ibid.).
Accepting a need-based family planning strategy in
principle, the validity of national fertility-reducing
goals would be dependent on the premise that there
exist sufficient unmet needs or, for that matter,
the prospect that an effective development strategy
can generate sufficient demand in this respect. Theoretically
speaking, a strong fertility-reducing goal may be
incompatible with an unmet need-based family planning
strategy where people desire a large family size.
In order to reconcile reproductive freedom, quality
of care and national demographic goals, it is important
to define the dynamics of unmet needs and related
issues and use this information in the decision-making
process.
1. Centrality of family planning
Family planning deserve a special focus within the
framework of reproductive health. The health and economic
benefits of family planning constitute good reasons
for making it the central focus of national programmes.
Through promotion of the practice of family planning,
a programme can achieve many other reproductive health
or related goals. For example, family planning prevents
unwanted fertility and thereby provides freedom outside
of pregnancy and childbearing, and creates opportunities
for women to participate in productive activities.
It also improves the health of mothers and children
significantly and is associated with declines in maternal
and infant mortality. Women's participation in social
and economic activities and improved health contributes
to their status in the family and society. Family
planning reduces the incidence of induced abortion
and also helps in the prevention of STDs/HIV. In addition,
family planning services offer an excellent opportunity
to integrate some reproductive health components effectively
with little additional cost and effort. For example,
as a part of family planning services, potential acceptors
are given a routine gynaecological check-up for the
screening of contraindications. This contact can be
an economic way of diagnosing reproductive tract infections
and providing treatment. Since some contraceptive
methods (for example, IUDs) cannot even be prescribed
without ensuring that the woman has no reproductive
tract infection; in fact, diagnosis and treatment
of reproductive tract infection would be in the best
interests of promoting family planning practice. In
this regard, family planning and reproductive health
are mutually reinforcing.
Hence, family planning represents the single most
important component of reproductive health services
which can help achieve maximum impact over a broad
range of reproductive health components. An important
challenge that the UNFPA programme may confront in
the aftermath of the Cairo Conference is how to broaden
the scope of its support for a range of reproductive
health services without losing the necessary focus
and priority on family planning.
2. Relevance of individual rights and freedom of
choice to quality of care
A wider choice in family planning services can contribute
to increased contraceptive effectiveness through three
mechanisms. First, individual preferences vary and
the reproductive health needs of individuals and couples
change in the course of a lifetime; no single method
can meet everyone's needs. Therefore, a broader method
option is more likely to meet the needs of a larger
number of couples. Second, the availability of a broader
choice can allow users to switch from an unsuitable
method to another which might be more acceptable.
In this regard, single-method continuation rates conventionally
used as an indicator of programme effectiveness can
be misleading. A follow-up survey, as shown in table
VI.1, found that the continuation rate at 30 months
of first-IUD use was only 27.5 per cent, as compared
with 47.2 per cent for all-IUD use, 72.8 per cent
for all-method use and 78.9 per cent for effective
prevention of unwanted births through the combined
use of contraception and abortion (Freedman and Takeshita,
1969).
Third, provision of many methods in the programme
would ensure the availability of some even in the
face of short-term out-of-stock or delay in supplies,
owing either to resource constraints or a lack of
adequate forward planning for timely procurement.

C. Current practices in family planning
programmes
1. Reproductive rights and quality of care
Individual desire to exercise reproductive intentions
forms an important basis for reproductive rights.
There are several aspects of reproductive life that
determine individuals' physical and emotional well-being
and psychological satisfaction. In a broader sense,
although reproductive rights may be assumed to cover
physical, mental and social well-being, its attainment
is dependent on specific aspects of programmes designed
to meet reproductive intentions, such as accessibility
to services, broader contraceptive options, freedom
of choice and a non-coercive environment to attain
the above.
Following the Cairo Conference, many countries have
adopted policies in favour of reproductive rights.
For example, Cambodia adopted a Birth Spacing Policy
in 1996, which, despite its narrow title, sets broader
principles, in conformity with the Programme of Action,
as stated: "Everyone has the right to the enjoyment
of the highest standard of physical and mental health"
and "Couples and individuals have the right to
decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing
of their children and to have the education and means
to do so." China formulated its Programme for
the Promotion of Family Planning in China (1995-2000)
with a provision that "Quality service in family
planning should be provided to the people of childbearing
age, particularly reproductive health care for women
to protect their health". The Philippines has
withdrawn method-related financial subsidies and taken
steps to integrate family planning and other reproductive
health services.
(a) Accessibility
Lack of basic access to fertility regulation was
the main concern in most countries in the 1970s. Since
then, access to family planning has improved significantly
in all parts of the world, and more significantly
in Asia. In 80 per cent of Asian countries, more than
half the people have access to at least one method,
as compared with 60 per cent in Africa (UNFPA, 1997a).
As shown in table VI.2, people in Asia have greater
and more equitable access to different contraceptive
methods as compared with other regions, especially
Africa.
The extent of unmet needs for selected countries
of the region, shown in table VI.3, indicates a wide
diversity. While most countries in the list have created
basic access to fertility regulation services and
thereby raised contraceptive prevalence to above 50
per cent, unmet need in a few countries, such as Cambodia,
the Lao People's Democratic Republic and Myanmar,
has remained very high, estimated at 76.3, 62.0 and
64.2 per cent of married women of reproductive age
respectively.

Estimated unmet need in Cambodia, the
Lao People's Democratic Republic and Myanmar stands
out in clear contrast to other countries in the list,
where unmet need varies from a low of 10.6 per cent
in Indonesia to a high of 23.5 per cent in the Philippines.
The high level of unmet need in Cambodia, the Lao
People's Democratic Republic and Myanmar indicates,
on the one hand, a basic lack of access to fertility
regulation information and services, while, on the
other hand, it suggests that with increased accessibility,
contraceptive prevalence would rise rapidly.
However, this macro-level analysis may not reflect
accurately the real extent of unmet needs. As indicated
by available evidence, a certain proportion of respondents
in conventional surveys desire additional children,
but, at the same time, practise contraception. There
is also evidence to show that the levels of unmet
need grow with initial rises in contraceptive prevalence.
Therefore, the level of unmet need as shown in the
high-prevalence countries should not be seen as the
final limit. With further improvement of accessibility,
especially to currently under-served segments of the
population, especially adolescents, and improved quality
of care, demand is likely to grow further. Individual
follow-up is essential to ensure that the services
are meeting unmet need.
(b) Broader contraceptive options
The rights of couples and individuals to choose freely
depend on the availability of a broader range of methods
in the programme, as well as access to full information
on their use and source and convenient ways to obtain
them. There is clear evidence that a broader range
of methods would result in an overall higher level
of contraceptive use, and this is well documented
by many researchers (Ross and others, 1989). Table
VI.4 shows the overall contraceptive practice and
method mix for selected countries in the region.

China, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea,
Mongolia, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Sri Lanka,
Thailand and Viet Nam, have achieved a contraceptive
prevalence rate above 60 per cent. Of these, some
countries (China, the Democratic People's Republic
of Korea, Mongolia and Viet Nam), despite an overall
wide coverage, lack broader contraceptive options
owing to limited focus in their strategies. Among
these countries, China and Viet Nam have emphasized
methods, such as IUDs and sterilization, which would
be programmatically more cost-effective or would appear
to have a greater demographic impact. Notably, they
have achieved a high contraceptive prevalence, even
with a narrow range of methods.
A few other countries, such as India and Nepal, have
emphasized sterilization strongly. Limited contraceptive
options have constituted one of the main reasons for
which these countries have met the unmet need only
marginally. Despite the fact that the family planning
programme of India started long before those of other
countries in the list, contraceptive prevalence has
grown to only around 41 per cent. Although sterilization
was emphasized in Sri Lanka, other methods were not
neglected. As a result, despite the predominant use
of sterilization, Sri Lanka has also achieved overall
high contraceptive prevalence.
It is both desirable and legitimate to make a wide
range of methods available, especially more effective
methods, where demographic goals are the major concern,
but without specific emphasis on any one method. Regarding
the method-mix in programmes, it has been concluded
by Bongaarts (1997) that "the wide availability
of effective methods through the public or private
sector is required to achieve high levels of effectiveness."
By the same token, he also concluded: "Efforts
to promote the most effective methods without giving
women a wide choice (as was done, for example, in
India's programme with its emphasis on sterilization)
are counter- productive and should be avoided".
It may be noted that most countries, except China,
the Republic of Korea and Singapore, have very low
use of male methods such as condoms and male sterilization.
Use of these methods, as a percentage of all methods,
is most frequent in Singapore (33.8 per cent), Republic
of Korea (27.9 per cent), Nepal (25.6 per cent) and
China (15.9 per cent), as compared with the Democratic
People's Republic of Korea (0.5 per cent), the Lao
People's Democratic Republic (2.0 per cent), Indonesia
(2.9 per cent) and Thailand (3.2 per cent). Although
Thailand has otherwise promoted a broader contraceptive
mix, the use of male methods has remained low. Although
it is desirable that countries at a high risk of the
spread of HIV should promote condom use, four countries
categorized as high-risk in this regard (Cambodia,
India, Myanmar and Thailand) have very low use rates
of condoms, at 0.3, 2.4, 0.1 and 0.5 per cent of eligible
couples respectively (table VI.4).
In recent years, some of the countries have adopted
policies to diversify method options. However, success
has been limited, in some cases owing to inadequate
strategies to promote equal choice. In other cases,
this was due to method-related incentives which, deliberately
or unintentionally, promote the use of specific methods.
As shown in table VI.4, the contraceptive method mix
in these countries still shows the predominant use
of one or two methods. The IUD and female sterilization
are still the major methods used in China. Sterilization
use is also most dominant in India, Nepal and the
Republic of Korea. The IUD is the main method used
in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Mongolia
and Viet Nam.
Viet Nam has reaffirmed its intention to broaden
contraceptive options and has adopted several measures
to broaden contraceptive services. Although the programme
strategies are still inadequate to achieve this objective
in full, recent trends in the contraceptive mix indicate
a slow shift toward a broader mix (as shown in table
VI.5). Condom use rose from 1.2 per cent in 1988 to
4.0 per cent in 1994, and pill use from 0.4 to 2.1
per cent during the same period. In order to achieve
more significant shifts in method mix, the Viet Nam
programme may review present financial remuneration
systems.

(c) Freedom of method choice in programmes
Free choice of methods can significantly affect contraceptive
use continuation and effectiveness. A study of 2,500
new acceptors in East Java, Indonesia, found a discontinuation
rate of 85 per cent among those who did not receive
the method they originally requested, as compared
with only 25 per cent among those who received the
method of their choice (Pariani and others, 1991).
Besides the lack of availability of a broader range
of methods in the programme, there are other factors
that can limit freedom of choice. As noted earlier,
a programme can stress selected methods, especially
those which are perceived to be more effective, because
of a primary concern for population control goals.
Examples have been drawn from China and Indonesia.
Method-specific emphasis also arises from a prevailing
notion among many programme managers that free choice
may not always be best for the clients. According
to this notion, asking illiterate or semi-literate
women, who are unaware of their own health problems
and needs, to choose for themselves, may not be meaningful.
On the other hand, choices made for them by an experienced
and trained service provider, taking into account
their needs, were felt to offer a better choice. The
inappropriateness of this position has been explained
earlier.
Emphasis on more effective methods in Indonesia arises
from the law, which provides for "methods which
are efficient and effective and which can be accepted
by husband and wife couples in accordance with their
choice" (Indonesia, 1993). Interpreting this
legal provision, the Indonesian programme promotes
the use of more effective methods and, inadvertently
or unintentionally, discourages the use of condoms
and oral pills. The effects of method-specific programme
emphasis are reflected in the patterns of method-mix
shifts during the last 20 years in Indonesia.

As shown in table VI.6, the combined
use of IUDs, injections, sterilization and Norplant
(which are perceived as more effective methods) in
Java-Bali increased from 6.1 per cent in 1976 to 38.8
per cent in 1994, whereas, during the same time period,
the combined use of pills and condoms increased from
16.7 to 17.6 per cent (Indonesia, 1995).
(d) Method-linked incentives
Target-oriented strategies led to the adoption of
method-linked incentives in many programmes in the
1960s and 1970s. Incentives were provided to acceptors,
providers and motivators/referrers of acceptors. A
few well-known examples of programme use of incentives
were Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
Programmes in these countries provided financial remuneration
to acceptors on several justifications, such as reimbursement
for transport or compensation for loss of time and
wages. To the extent that poverty was a major barrier
in contraceptive acceptance, financial compensation
was found to remove the barrier and promote acceptance.
In many instances, it was presumed to have a triggering
effect, sometimes expressed as "leading the client
over the fence". However, in many instances,
the amounts of remuneration far exceeded what would
be needed for transport and wage loss. In such cases,
incentives created a positive inducement among potential
acceptors to override other factors in the decision-making
process and led to dissatisfaction and regret among
acceptors of permanent methods. Such inducements are
also known to have led to overreporting, and neglect
of counselling and quality of care.
A study of financial compensation, conducted in Bangladesh
with World Bank support, provides some insights (Cleland
and Mauldin, 1991). The study found that the amounts
of client payments made exceeded the costs associated
with the procedures and acted as positive inducements,
especially among poorer sections of the population.
It also found that, despite an overall high level
of client satisfaction, 25 per cent of the acceptors
of permanent methods subsequently expressed regret
that they had been sterilized. Payments also played
a major role in acceptance.

As shown in table VI.7, money played
a direct or contributory role in the acceptance of
37 per cent of the tubectomy cases and 53 per cent
of the vasectomy cases. In addition, financial remuneration
to motivators referring clients led to the targeting
of poor people and the promotion of sterilization
at the expense of other methods.
Trends in contraceptive mix in two neighbouring countries,
Bangladesh and Nepal, in which incentives have been
widely used on different scales and forms and at different
times, show an interesting pattern. Both these countries
started promoting contraceptive practice with a large
emphasis on sterilization through method-linked incentives.
This resulted in a high rate of sterilization use,
accounting for 53.6 per cent of all modern methods
in Bangladesh in 1983 and 76.3 per cent of all modern
methods in Nepal in 1981 (table VI.8). Thereafter,
with changing policies on incentives, the contraceptive
method mix changed significantly in Bangladesh, with
sterilization declining to only 25.1 per cent of modern
methods in 1993, whereas sterilization continued to
dominate in Nepal at 67.0 per cent of modern methods
in 1996.

Another example of the effects of incentives
can be drawn from the Philippines. During the pre-Cairo
Conference period, service providers used to receive
P300 for each female sterilization and P200 for each
male sterilization they performed. After the Cairo
Conference, the Philippine programme adopted a policy
of non-coercion to allow couples "to decide whether
to have children, when and how many, or whether to
practise family planning" (WHO/WPRO, 1995), and
accordingly financial incentives were withdrawn. This
policy change appears to have contributed to a shift
in contraceptive mix, shown in table VI.9, with a
significant rise in the use of pills, injectables
and condoms.

The impact of the target-free approach
can be illustrated by the findings of an experimental
pilot project in two districts (Tonk and Dausa) of
the State of Rajasthan in India, where integrated
family planning and selected other reproductive health
services have recently been provided, without the
assignment of any target or quota for the service
providers. The project also emphasized the provision
of broader contraceptive options. Within two years,
contraceptive prevalence in the two districts increased
by about 50 per cent, from 31 and 35 per cent to 47.4
and 48.9 per cent respectively (Singh, 1997).
Method-linked financial remuneration for providers
is basically designed to create motives among providers
to emphasize methods which are user-independent, effective
and have higher continuation rates. In Viet Nam, despite
a recent government policy of broadening the contraceptive
method mix through free and informed choice, the programme
still provides financial remuneration for performing
selected methods, such as sterilization, IUD and menstrual
regulation. In the case of sterilization, the programme
persons motivating sterilization acceptors are also
benefited by the payment system. This financial incentive
system appears to create an unequal opportunity for
method acceptance and, perhaps, can potentially affect
the quality of care (Knodel and others, 1995). As
a result, despite a genuine intention to broaden method
mix in Viet Nam, the impact so far has been minimal.
In addition to the above factors, regulatory restriction
limits the freedom of choice. For example, restricted
eligibility criteria for the acceptance of sterilization
and the requirement of bureaucratic approval for sterilization
create a significant barrier in Myanmar. Similarly,
in Mongolia, female sterilization is provided only
on medical grounds. Sterilization has been permitted
in the Lao People's Democratic Republic only recently;
however, a couple must have more than six children
to be eligible for the procedure (UNFPA, 1998). Shortages
of supplies, owing either to resource constraints
or lack of adequate forward planning for timely procurement,
have also been found to impede freedom of choice temporarily.
(e) Practices regarding an integrated approach
The integration of family planning and other reproductive
health services can enhance clients' perspectives
significantly. Although several alternative modalities
for the integration of family planning with health
interventions were proposed during the early days
of family planning, the concept and rationale for
integration have changed during the last two decades.
While integration used to be seen as a means to maximize
the impact of family planning, under the broader principles
of reproductive health, the context of integration
has moved towards making services user-friendly and
client-centred. However, despite a shift in the basic
rationale, the strategy of multiple modalities for
integration remains valid from the point of view of
programme organization and viability.
A few countries in the subregion, such as Cambodia,
the Lao People's Democratic Republic and Myanmar,
have weak family planning programmes. Despite their
limited institutional capacity, they have one advantage,
that is, they have not inherited a divided organizational
structure and therefore have a better opportunity
to plan and adopt an integrated approach. For these
countries, resource constraints and insufficient institutional
capacity are, however, likely to impede undertaking
a full spectrum of reproductive health services. Therefore,
policy would require the application of a selective
approach, based on identified priorities and, where
appropriate, emphasizing family planning. The immediate
concern for these countries should be to give priority
to the creation of accessibility to basic services
for family planning. As indicated from the present
situation in these countries, Cambodia and the Lao
People's Democratic Republic will need greater IEC
efforts focused on awareness creation, while Myanmar
will need more method-specific education and counselling,
as initial activities.
(f) Misconceived strategies
Although demographic goals of reducing population
growth rates are legitimate in a development context,
the strategies of promoting more effective methods
for the same purpose are misconceived. As explained
earlier, free choice is more likely to result in a
more sustained use of contraceptives, and thereby
achieve demographic goals as well as meet individual
needs (Pariani, 1991). By this token, the one-child
policy of China, together with its target-oriented
strategy, which puts strong pressure on couples and
individuals in favour of more effective contraceptive
methods, restricts freedom of choice. Such policies
also create additional health risks owing to frequent
recourse to abortion whenever childbearing exceeds
the accepted norm. As indicated earlier, given appropriate
strategies for the quality of care, the demographic
rationale for family planning can be compatible with
quality-of-care principles.
D. Implementation of quality-of-care strategies
1. Essentiality of quality of care for all programmes
It should be noted that quality is not a standard,
but a property that all programmes should have. Since
standards may vary according to existing institutional
capacity, programmes should decide on the standard
of care that they wish to offer. According to the
Bruce framework, quality-of-care principles are uniformly
applicable under varied levels of standards. Moreover,
the application of quality-of-care strategies does
not require an appreciable amount of additional resources;
what is required is commitment and understanding.
Although the quality-of-care framework was developed
by Bruce in the context of family planning, its principles
are applicable more widely for reproductive health.
2. Need for improved understanding among policy makers
and the adoption of clear strategies: advocacy
In order to create commitment among policy makers
in favour of quality-of-care measures, it is essential
that they develop a clear understanding of the relevant
issues. For the purpose, focused advocacy efforts
can convince the policy makers that quality-of-care
principles are viable and cost-effective, and especially
that free choice can lead to a higher level of practice
as well as more effective use. Top-level commitment
should also allow the adoption of programme strategies
for the application of quality-of-care measures, including
a broader range of contraceptive options, informed
consent and free choices. Commitment at all levels
of services, together with a strategic shift in services,
is essential to promote the principles of informed
consent. In this regard, it is necessary to dispel
doubts and fears that full information, especially
on side effects, can decrease acceptance.
(a) Quality-oriented information, education and communication
Informed choice can be promoted through the strengthening
of people's knowledge on all aspects of contraceptives,
including their side effects, effectiveness, instructions
for use and what to do in the case of side effects,
and how to obtain services or supplies. IEC efforts
are essential to meet the needs of quality-of-care
objectives. IEC should be focused on country-specific
needs. As examples of need-based IEC efforts, it may
be suggested that Cambodia and the Lao People's Democratic
Republic focus on basic contraceptive awareness-raising.
Myanmar may benefit by aiming at more method-specific
knowledge. Viet Nam could aim at more equitable knowledge
of all methods. Indonesia may benefit by emphasizing
knowledge of temporary methods, especially of condoms.
(b) Gender equity and population stabilization goals
In addition to the above, the programmes and policies
to promote gender equity and population stabilization,
in the context of development goals, can potentially
create a supportive environment for free expression
of reproductive rights and thereby promote freedom
of choice. Owing to close interlinkages between the
quality of care and gender approaches, programme strategies
designed to make services gender-sensitive will also
improve the quality of care on several counts, including
broader options, freedom of choice, informed consent
and user-friendly services.
3. Client-centred approaches
(a) Provision of a non-coercive environment
A non-coercive programme environment is a prerequisite
for attaining quality-of-care objectives. It is, therefore,
necessary to review the practices regarding special
method-linked emphasis, use of targets, and quota
and incentive systems in programmes. If necessary,
studies should be undertaken to determine their impact
on choice as instruments to convince policy makers.
While targets at the national level are useful tools
for the planning process, they should not be assigned
to service providers. If financial or material incentives
in programmes are unavoidable, amounts should be at
levels which do not negate the principle of informed
and free choice. Vietnamese programmes can promote
equitable choice by reviewing the current payment
systems for contraceptive acceptance. China can improve
informed choice by reviewing the target system even
without giving up the intended goal of fertility reduction.
India and Nepal can further promote equitable choice.
(b) Strengthening of interpersonal communication
Considering that the interpersonal aspects of quality
of care have been neglected in the past, special efforts
are needed to strengthen this aspect of services.
Besides placing an increased emphasis on interpersonal
communication and counselling as important and integral
parts of services, it is essential to improve providers'
communication and counselling skills, designed to
promote informed choice, in conformity with the recommendation
in the Programme of Action: "The principle of
informed free choice is essential to the long-term
success of family planning programmes. Any form of
coercion has no part to play" (paragraph 7.12).
The existing training courses should integrate properly
planned modules to strengthen provider skills in interpersonal
communication.
It has also been found that training alone may be
insufficient to result in the application of quality-of-care
measures. The real obstacle is low motivation among
staff (Simmons and Simmons, 1992). Therefore, a package
of interdependent strategies, including clearly expressed
quality-of- care goals, quality-oriented monitoring
systems, and supportive supervision and guidance,
would be more effective. Nearly all the countries
in the region can further improve interpersonal communication
and counselling.
(c) User-oriented follow-up systems
Client perspectives in programmes can be improved
through reorienting their follow-up systems, not to
follow method users, but to follow individuals irrespective
of their contraceptive use status and switching practices
(Jain, 1992). The service system should follow individuals
through different phases of reproductive life, including
practice and non-practice, pregnant and non-pregnant
statuses, and advise, serve, support and reassure
them, as and when necessary. Such honest brokerage
can build a mutual trust relationship that would eventually
make counselling most effective. Programme record-keeping
systems can also be built on such an objective.
(d) Integration of reproductive health services
The integration of family planning with other reproductive
health services can meet many other health needs of
the clients during a single visit and thereby make
services user-friendly and acceptable. This will also
improve the programme's credibility among people.
Integration should not be viewed as an "all or
none" situation. Countries can achieve a great
deal, in terms of improved quality of care, even through
partial or functional integration, where organizational
structures do not permit full integration. Appropriate
packaging of service interventions, as an appropriate
constellation, can achieve the objectives of integration
to a great extent.
Three factors should be taken into account in the
packaging of services: perceived priorities, programme
capacity, and resources. Broadening of scope can be
done gradually on an incremental basis, especially
where capacity and resources are limited. For several
countries in the subregion, the most appropriate add-on
intervention would be STDs/RTIs. Significant health
benefits can be derived from the integration of STDs/RTIs
with family planning and maternal care, especially
preventive counselling, education and referral. Combining
contraceptive service skills with those on STD management
will improve medical screening of IUD acceptors and,
in turn, improve the safety of IUD use. Such action,
for example, would be relevant for Viet Nam, because
of a high incidence of reproductive tract infections
and a high rate of IUD use.
(e) Understanding of users' preferences
The policy of informed choice can be promoted best
if consumer preferences of different methods, together
with associated cultural, psychological and economic
factors, are better understood. Improved knowledge
of consumer concerns, possible side effects, effectiveness
and convenience of use will strengthen information
provision, counselling and IEC functions. However,
in the countries of the region, such efforts are minimal.
Improved and focused research strategies can generate
knowledge to contribute to users' perspectives.
4. Broadening of contraceptive options promoting
freedom of choice
As discussed earlier, a broader range of contraceptives
in the programme can meet the needs and preferences
of more individuals. Even for countries having a primary
and major concern to reduce population growth rates,
the provision of a broader range of methods with freedom
to choose from them would allow a better chance to
achieve demographic and health goals. As quoted earlier,
method-specific emphasis in programmes can eventually
be counterproductive and should, therefore, be avoided.
(a) Introduction/reintroduction of methods
Broader choice can be promoted in many countries
through the introduction of additional methods and
the reintroduction of methods or improved methods
which were not being appropriately utilized. For example,
Viet Nam can introduce injectable contraceptives.
Countries, especially those with a high incidence
of teenage pregnancy (Indonesia,Myanmar and the Philippines)
and unsafe abortion (Cambodia and Myanmar), may consider
the introduction of emergency contraception. Through
the application of reintroduction strategies, method
utilization can be improved. An example would be the
possibility of wider use of Copper T 380 in Indonesia,
in place of the Lippes loop. Some countries in the
South Asian region can promote the acceptability and
effectiveness of several reversible methods through
the application of well-designed reintroduction strategies.
(b) Broadening of source/channels of services
The use of broad-based channels of services is likely
to meet the choices of larger segments of the population.
Therefore, services should be provided through as
many channels as possible, such as clinical networks,
community-based systems, social marketing, NGOs, and
places of employment and other settings, and involving
the private and commercial sectors. Countries which
can potentially broaden contraceptive sources are
Cambodia, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea,
the Lao People's Democratic Republic, Mongolia and
Myanmar through the use of NGOs, community-based delivery
and social marketing channels.
5. Need-based monitoring of programmes
The existing systems are not focused on individuals
to monitor the extent to which the programmes are
able to meet unmet need and prevent unwanted pregnancies.
Common indicators used by family planning programmes
to measure performance are fertility rates, contraceptive
prevalence rates, the number of new acceptors of family
planning methods and couple years of protection. These
indicators do not show the extent to which reproductive
intentions have been fulfilled through meeting unmet
need.
A new approach is under trial for monitoring the
success of family planning programmes in meeting needs,
through use of the HARI Index (Jain and Bruce, 1995).
The HARI index is an acronym for "Helping individuals
Achieve their Reproductive Intentions". It is
based on the percentage of women who are able to effectively
avoid unintended pregnancy (or birth) and do not experience
morbidity in a 24-month period. The HARI index proposes
measures based on the percentage of couples who are
able to successfully prevent unwanted pregnancy and
maternal morbidity. "Success" is defined
by no-pregnancy/ birth for those who do not want any
more children as well as pregnancy/birth among those
who want more children now. Theoretically speaking,
the inability to bear children by one who wants to
have a child would be a failure, except for the fact
that services in most developing countries are grossly
inadequate to assist infertile women in this regard.
Application of the HARI approach can be made in different
pathways and programmes can adjust the scope according
to the scope of available data. The values of the
HARI index, based on secondary analysis of data collected
for other studies, for selected countries are shown
in table VI.10, as an example.

As noted earlier, when the period
of observation in Taiwan Province of China was increased
from three to seven years, the HARI index declined,
owing to an increase in cumulative failure rates.
The low index in the Philippines is perhaps due to
low accessibility. Because of the limited scope of
the data, the analysis could not distinguish between
different types of failures.
Although the principles of HARI have only been tested
in a limited field situation, preliminary experience
indicates that its use will carry significant implications,
not only for the reproductive health strategies and
policies but also for the existing management information
systems. For example, family planning programme strategies
followed in Indonesia and Viet Nam would not provide
a suitable situation for the application of the principles
unless there was a basic change in strategies regarding
the criteria applied to method provision.
The development of an indicator system to meet the
data needs of the HARI approach is not a simple matter,
especially for unwanted childbearing. Theoretically,
most survey data can be analysed by unwanted and wanted
childbearing, except for the fact that retrospective
data on "wantedness" are likely to be biased.
It is, therefore, necessary to develop an indicator
system providing for collection of data on reproductive
intention and other related information on a prospective
basis.
E. Conclusions and observations
1. Target-free strategies
A target-free approach, together with a non-coercive
environment, can improve the quality of care
Freedom of choice can lead to sustained and effective
contraceptive use and achieve a greater demographic
impact
Financial payments and method-linked incentives affect
the quality of care and do not necessarily promote
contraceptive prevalence
While national-level targets can be useful planning
tools, these should not result in quotas to be assigned
to service providers
2. Client-centred approaches
Integrated service strategies make services user-friendly
and improve the quality of care
Interpersonal communication and counselling are essential
tools to provide information, improve choice and thereby
the quality of care
Tailor-made IEC efforts can contribute to informed
choice, quality of care and freedom of choice
Client-centred follow-up and individual need-based
monitoring systems can provide feedback on the quality
of care
Because of the commonality of approaches, gender-sensitive
strategies can contribute to quality of care
Broader options of sources, through multiple channels
such as NGOs, community-based distribution and social
marketing, can meet the needs of a wider segment of
population
3. Family planning rationale and population goals
Quality-of-care principles are compatible with population
stabilization strategies which can create a better
environment for the expression of reproductive rights
Unmet need and the demand for family planning are
not static, but rise with increased accessibility
and improved quality of care, and move in the direction
of population stabilization goals
4. Supporting strategies
Focused research to understand client concerns would
contribute to improved quality-of-care strategies
Advocacy efforts are needed to create improved understanding
and commitment regarding the quality of care among
policy makers
End Notes
* Atiqur Rahman Khan, adviser on reproductive health/family
planning programme; Tan Boon-Ann, adviser on programme
design, development and evaluation; and Suman Mehta,
adviser on reproductive health/family planning training
research, United Nations Population Fund/Country Support
Team for East and South-East Asia, Bangkok.
References
Abou-Zahr, C. (1994). WHO, Should All Research on
Quality of Care be Intervention Related? Report on
the Workshop on Quality of Care for Women, Budapest,
October 1994.
Bangladesh (1994). Bangladesh Demographic and Health
Survey,-1993-1994, (National Institute of Population
Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra Associates,
Dhaka, Macro International Inc.).
Bongaarts, J. (1997). Trends in Unwanted Childbearing
in the Developing World, No. 98 (New York, Population
Council).
Bruce, J. (1989). Fundamental Elements of Quality
of Care: A Simple Framework, Population Council Working
Paper No 19, and Studies in Family Planning, 21(2):61-91.
Bruce, J., and A. Jain (1991), "Improving quality
of care through operations research", in Myrna
Seidman and Marjorie Horn, eds., Operations Research:
Helping Family Planning Programs Work Better (New
York).
Cambodia (1995). Kap Survey on Fertility and Contraception
in Cambodia (National Maternal and Child Health Centre,
July 1995).
China (1993). China Family Planning Year Book, State
Family Planning Commission, Beijing.
____(1995). Family Planning in China (State Council
of the People's Republic of China, Beijing).
Cleland, J. and P.Mauldin (1991). "The promotion
of family planning by financial payments: the case
of Bangladesh", Studies in Family Planning, January-February
1991.
Donabedian, A. (1988). "The quality of care:
how can it be assessed?" Journal of the American
Medical Association, vol. 260. No. 12: pp. 1743-1748.
Freedman, R. and J.Y Takeshita, (1969). Family Planning
in Taiwan (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Haryono Suyono (1994). Minister of Population, Indonesia,
Address at the Population Association of America,
2 May 1994.
Hull, V.J. (1994). "Improving quality of care
in family planning: how far have we come?" Sixth
Annual Meeting of the Indonesian Epidemiology Network,
October 1994.
India (1994), National Family Health Survey (MCH
and Family Planning), India 1992-93, Introductory
Report (Bombay, India International Institute for
Population Studies)
Indonesia (1993). State Ministry for Population,
Indonesia, Law on Population Development and the Development
of Happy and Prosperous Families (Jakarta).
____(1995). Demographic and Health Survey 1994 (Central
Bureau of Statistics, National Family Planning Coordinating
Board (BKKBN)).
Jain, A.K. ed. (1992), Managing Quality of Care in
Population Programs (United States, Kumarian Press).
Jain, A.K. and J.Bruce (1995). "Implications
of reproductive health objectives and efficacy of
family planning programs" (Population Council,
circulated in a workshop on quality of care).
Knodel, J. and others (1995). Viet Nam's Population
and Family Planning Program as Viewed by its Implementors,
Regional Working Papers No.2 (Population Council,
Bangkok).
Lao People's Democratic Republic (1995). Report on
the Fertility and Birth Spacing Survey (National Statistical
Centre).
Mongolia (1994). Mongolia Demographic Survey, (Population
Teaching and Research Centre, Mongolian National University).
Myanmar (1995). Population Changes and Fertility
Survey, 1991 (Immigration and Population Department,
Ministry of Immigration and Population).
Nepal (1997). Nepal Family Health Survey 1996, (Family
Health Division, Ministry of Health, Government of
Nepal, New Era, Nepal and Macro International Inc.,
United States, July 1997).
Osteria, T. (1996). Assessment of Quality of Family
Planning Services in Selected Service Delivery Points
in the Philippines (Social Development Research Centre,
De La Salle University, Manila).
Pariani, S. and others (1991)."Does choice make
a difference to contraceptive use? Evidence from East
Java", Studies in Family Planning, vol. 22, No.
6 (New York, Population Council).
Philippines (1996a). "A Gender-responsive population
policy framework with reproductive health perspectives
(draft) (Commission on Population, Manila).
____(1996b), 1996 Family Planning Survey: Final Report
(National Statistical Office, Manila).
Ross, J.A and others (1989). Management Strategies
for Family Planning Programmes (Center for Population
and Family Planning, Columbia University, New York).
Simmons, R., and G.Simmons (1992). "Moving toward
a higher quality of care: challenges for management,
in A.K.Jain ed., Managing Quality of Care in Population
Programs (United States, Kumarian Press).
Singh, J.S. (1997). "A target-free approach
in family planning", E-mail communication from
KZPG Overpopulation News Network, 22 December 1997.
Singh, R. (1994). Family Planning Success Stories
(Asia, Latin America and Africa) (Bombay, UBS publishers).
Sri Lanka (1994), Demographic and Health Survey,
Sri Lanka 1993, Preliminary Report (Department of
Census and Statistics, Ministry of Policy Planning
and Implementation in collaboration with the Ministry
of Health and Women's Affairs).
United Nations (1974). The World Population Plan
of Action (World Population Conference, Bucharest),
para.14 f.
____(1994), World Contraceptive Use 1994 (New York).
____(1995), Report of the International Conference
on Population and Development, Cairo, 5-13 Sept 1994
(Sales No. E.95 XIII. 7).
____(1995a). Guidelines for UNFPA Support for Reproductive
Health, Including Family Planning and Sexual Health
(New York).
____(1995b). "Fourth Country Programme of Assistance
to the Philippines, 1994-1998, Strengthening the Management
and Field Implementation of the Family Planning/ Reproductive
Health Programme (Manila).
____(1997a). The State of the World Population (New
York), p.6.
____(1997b). Draft Programme of Assistance to the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
____(1997c). Draft Report of the UNFPA Programme
Support of Thailand.
____(1998). Official communications, UNFPA, Vientiane,
Februry 1998.
____Viet Nam (1990). Demographic and Health Survey
1988 (National Committee for Population and Family
Planning, Hanoi).
____(1995). Viet Nam Intercensal Demographic Survey:
Major Findings (Statistical Publishing House).
WHO/WPRO (1995). A Reproductive Health Profile of
the Western Pacific Region (WHO Regional Office for
the Western Pacific, Manila).
WHO/SEARO (1996). Regional Health Report (WHO, Regional
Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi).
|