Electricity generation in the ESCAP region continued
to grow from 1999 to 2001. Total electricity generation
reached 3, 759 TWh in 2001. Figure 1 shows the development
in generation for selected countries, where data are
available from 1990 to 2001. It may be noted that
North and Central Asian countries, including the Russian
Federation, have not been included in this publication
because of lack of data.
In spite of the financial crisis of 1997, most countries
in the ESCAP region still experienced positive growth
in electricity generation during the crisis. In the
period from 1990 to 2001, the annual growth rate in
electricity generation was 5.0 per cent, compared
to an annual growth rate of 6.0 per cent between 1990
and 1996.
The high annual growth rate in electricity generation
from 1990 to 2001 was mainly due to the annual growth
rate of 8.3 per cent in the Republic of Korea, 8.0
per cent in Thailand and Sri Lanka, and 7.7 per cent
in China.
|
Figure
1. Electricity generation, 1990-2001 |
|
Note:
“Total” includes generation in Australia;
China; Hong Kong, China; Japan; India;
Macao, China; Pakistan; Philippines; Republic of Korea;
Singapore; Sri Lanka; and Thailand. |
| |
The
annual growth rate in electricity generation of 4.7
per cent from 1999 to 2001 was attributed to self generating
industry (5.8 per cent) and privately owned utilities
(1.7 per cent) as shown in figure 2. Although electricity
generation by publicly owned utilities grew 3.1 per
cent between 1999 and 2000, it experienced a negative
annual growth rate of 3.1 per cent between 2000 and
2001. This was due to a decrease in electricity generation
by publicly owned utilities in Pakistan (11.4 per cent),
Sri Lanka (7.8 per cent, Turkey (7.4 per cent) and Thailand
(3.4 per cent).
|
Figure
2. Electricity generation by ownership, 1999-2001
|
|
Note:
Including data from Azerbaijan; Bhutan; Hong Kong,
China; India; Japan; Macao, China;
Malaysia; Pakistan; Singapore; Sri Lanka; Thailand;
Turkey and Viet Nam. |
| |
Figure
3 shows that electricity generation in the region is
dominated by a few large countries, with China alone
accounting for 28 per cent. Australia, China, India,
Japan, the Republic of Korea and the Russian Federation
together accounted for about 87 per cent of the total
generation in the countries considered.
|
Figure
3. Electricity generation by country, 2000 |
|
Note:
Including data from Australia; Azerbaijan; China;
Hong Kong, China; India; Indonesia;
Japan; Macao, China; Malaysia; Mongolia; Nepal; Pakistan;
Papua New Guinea; Philippines;
Republic of Korea; Russian Federation; Singapore;
Sri Lanka; Thailand; Turkey and Viet Nam. |
| |
Variations
in the level of consumption per capita between developed
countries mainly reflected differences in energy end-use
efficiency and in the structure and type of economic
sectors. Electricity consumption per capita varied substantially,
with the level of consumption in developed countries,
such as Australia, Japan and Singapore, more than 100
times higher than in developing countries such as India,
Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Viet Nam (see figure 4).
|
Figure
4. Electricity consumption per capita, 2001 |
|
| |
Figure
5 shows electricity demand by sector. The industrial
sector accounted for 43 per cent of total electricity
demand. The industrial and household sectors together
accounted for more than 50 per cent of total electricity
demand. There were quite large variations among countries
regarding the distribution of demand by different consumer
groups (see overview table 5).
|
Figure
5. Electricity demand per sector, 2001 |
|
Note:
Including data from Australia; Azerbaijan; Hong Kong,
China; India; Indonesia; Japan; Macao, China; Malaysia;
Mongolia; Pakistan; Papua New Guinea; Singapore; Sri
Lanka; Thailand; Turkey and Viet Nam. |
In figure 6, the price of 100 kWh electricity for domestic
and commercial consumers, respectively, is compared
by country (see 'currency, population
and GDP' table for exchange rates used for conversion
of currencies into United States dollars). In general,
commercial consumers paid more than domestic consumers,
contrary to most other commodities where larger consumers
have the benefit of lower prices per unit of consumption.
This indicates direct subsidies or cross-subsidies.
|
Figure 6. Electricity prices, 2001 |
|
Electricity
prices for domestic consumers in Azerbaijan, Bhutan
and Mongolia were relatively low while electricity prices
in Hong Kong, Japan, Macao and Singapore were relatively
high. Commercial consumers paid most in Hong Kong, Japan,
Macao and Pakistan, and least in Bhutan and Mongolia.
Electricity prices for industrial consumers were not
compared by country owing to a variety of price schemes
that made comparisons difficult (see overview table
7). |