![]() |
![]() |
|
COMPENDIUM OF SUMMARIES OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN ENVIRONMENT RELATED CASES INDIAIndia - Wildlife Preservation STATE OF BIHAR v. MURAD ALI KHAN IntroductionIn a written complaint filed in the Magistrates Court by a Range Forest Officer under the Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972, it was alleged that the accused had shot and killed an elephant in a range forest and had removed the tusks. The Magistrate ordered issue of process against the accused, even though investigations by the police were in progress in relation to the same offence. The High Court of Patna quashed the order of the Magistrate and the present special leave petitions were taken up for hearing by the Supreme Court against the findings of the High Court. Legislative FrameworkWildlife Protection Act 1972 - Sections 9(1), 51 and 55. Criminal Procedure Code - Section 210(1), 482. HeldSection 9(1) of the Act provides that no person shall hunt any wild animals specified in Schedule 1. An elephant is included in Schedule 1. Violation of section 9(1) is an offence under section 51(1) of the Act. Section 55 of the Act specifies that no court shall take cognisance of any offence against this Act except on the complaint of the Chief Wildlife Warden or such other officer as the state government may authorise in his behalf. The Supreme Court held that it could not be said that the Magistrate acted without jurisdiction in taking cognisance of the offence and ordering issue of process against the accused, merely because an investigation by the police was in progress in relation to the same offence. Cases CitedAIR 1983 SC 67:(1983) 1 SCR 884: 1983 Cri LJ 159 |
|
Copyright 1999-
© United Nations, All rights reserved. |