| Items in the table |
|
1 |
2,..4 |
5 |
| Improvement in either
the environment or
economic condition with
no harm to the other. |
Criteria for
"successful"
example for
sustainable
development
|
The practice must result in
either:
a. an improvement in the
environment situation
with at least no
deterioration in the
socio-economic
situation, or
b. an improvement in the
socio-economic situation
with at least no
deterioration in the
environment situation
|
|
An environment or socio-economic improvement is
achieved at the cost of
deterioration of the others. |
| Sustainable over time
(not one-off)
|
the practice must be
sustainable over time and
not a one-off event |
|
The practice is not time
bound. |
| Participation of the
community
|
The factors
for "good
practice" in
the process
of decision
making and
implementation.
|
Participation is a major
determinant of a
successful outcome |
|
Participation is not a
major determinant of a
successful outcome |
| Participation of
resource owners/users
|
Participation by resource
owners is a major
determinant of a
successful outcome |
|
Participation by resource
owners is not necessarily
the major determinant of
a successful outcome |
| Partnerships between various actors
(Governments, NGO, Academia, Private) |
Partnerships between various groups are a major
determinant of a successful outcome |
|
Partnership between various groups is not the
major determinant a successful outcome |
| Degree of coordination
and cooperation between government
departments. |
Coordination and cooperation play a key role in
successful outcome |
|
Coordination and
cooperation is irrelevant to
the success or failure of
this example |
| Ability to attract political interest/support |
The practice in the example can attract political support |
|
The practice is not politically very attractive |
| Procedures for feedback and review. |
The process of feedback and review is a key determinant
of successful outcome |
|
Feedback and review
process is not an important determinant of the outcome |
| Cost efficient. |
|
The example is efficient in terms of
· Economic (opportunity )
cost
· Institution (transaction)cost
· Exercise of due
diligence
|
|
The example involved
substantial financial,
administrative, and other
costs |
| Location adaptability
(can the project be done
in other places?)
|
Factors influencing applicability
and replicability |
Whether the specific (geographical or political)
location is the crucial factor to replicate this example
elsewhere |
|
This example is location specific |
| Socio-cultural adaptability. |
This example can be
applied in different cultural
background |
|
This example can be applied only in a specific
cultural context |
| Level of development
adaptability. |
This example can be replicated in countries/regions with
different stages of development |
|
This example can be replicated only in
countries/regions with a specific stage of
development |
| Style of government
adaptability. |
This example can be
applicable to whatever style
of the government |
|
This example can be
applicable only to a certain
style of the government |
| Degree of decentralization adaptability. |
This example can be replicated no matter what
degree the system is decentralized |
|
This example can be replicated in cases with a
specific degree of decentralization |
