Integrating Environmental Considerations into the Economic Decision-Making Process
Modalities for environmental assessments
Pacific IslandsSamoa Index
Previous Next
 

II. FISHERY RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT IN SAMOA

[ II-A | II-B |II-C ]

A. Development issues

[ A | A-1 | A-2]

1. Demand, supply and licensed exports/imports of fishery products

There are three main types of fishery in Samoa: 
  1. Oceanic fisheries: fisheries for tropical tuna carried out by local long-line vessels and distant-water fishing vessels, within the EEZ's of, and high seas adjacent to, Samoa. This fishery takes around 1000 tonnes of tuna per year. 
  2. Coastal fisheries for domestic consumption: multi-species reef and lagoon fisheries carried out mainly by village people in small-scale commercial and artisanal sectors, using hook and line, net, spear, traditional trap or weir and hand-collection. This fishery takes around 4,600 tonnes per year, of several hundred species of fish and invertebrates. (King, 1990).
  3. Coastal fisheries for export: a more limited range of species, primarily sea cucumbers, which obtain a high price in Chinese-speaking areas of the world. These fisheries are carried out mainly by local firms and are relatively low in total volume.
While there is a large local demand for fish, the market demand is limited because most rural villagers do not have the money to buy fish and most rural fishermen lack refrigeration to keep the fish. In Samoa, a fishing boat with outboard motor capable of going beyond the reef costs about WS$22,000, therefore WS$5 to $20 or more per fish depending on the size and species would need to be charged. Apia therefore is the main commercial fishing centre, while a new station on the island of Savaii has been set up. 

Only a small proportion of fish is exported. Data on the subsistence and artisanal Samoa fish catch is limited, outdated and controversial, but the best estimate of subsistence catch is about 4600 tonnes (King 1990), about 4 times greater than the fish sold commercially for local consumption. Official records on catch and exports provided by FAO are shown in Figure 1. (Experts caution that these estimates are little better than educated guesses). 

From the start of data collection records in 1975 until 1990 there was a dramatic decrease in reported fish catch. Direct observations of fish stocks by trained fisheries biologists, and anecdotal evidence from fishers, confirmed that the inshore reef fisheries were over-fished and that the coral reef habitats were severely stressed (FAO 1991). 

Figure 1. Samoa fisheries production and exports, 1996 

 
Note. This data does not include subsistence fish catch. 

Exporting fishery products is a minor industry compared with local consumption (see Figure 1). A commercial exporter (SAMPAC) exports deep water snappers, skipjack, yellowfin tuna, mangrove crabs, lobsters, clams and octopus. The recent introduction of longline fishing from the alia fishing boats (Figure 2) doubled the exports of offshore fish between 1995 and 1996. 

Collection and compilation of fishery products exported for food was improved in early 1995 with the start of a certification system. The system requires the inspection of fishery export products to assure they comply with specified terms and conditions. Fisheries officials, after inspecting the fish, issue a Certification for Fishery Products for Export. Table 2 summarises records of fishery products exported during the March-June, 1995 period. Tuna accounted for 72 per cent of the total exports in volume and 66 per cent in value. 

Figure 2. Samoan Alia fishing boat rigged for longlining. 

 

Table 2. Samoan government records of finfish products exported for food in the 4 month period March-June 1995 (Bell 1996). 
 
  WEIGHT VALUE
FISHERY KG Per cent of Total WS$ Per cent of Total
Tuna 28,369.30 72.0 50,599.86 66.0
Other offshore pelagics 1,630.38 4.0 1,651.89 2.0
Bottomfish 7,200.23 18.0 13,442.08 17.5
Bottomfish & Inshore Fish 2,209.09 6.0 11,201.52 14.5
TOTAL 39,409.00   76,895.35  
Samoa's 120,000 km2 Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), extending 200 miles off the coastline, is one of the smallest in the South Pacific. The country receives fees from distant water fishing nations that catch fish within its EEZ but their fishing area lies to the south of the major mid-Pacific tuna fishing area and there is little fishing effort. 

In 1994, Samoa licensed 37 Taiwanese Long Line Vessels to fish in their EEZ. They arrested six of these and fined them for non-compliance with the Terms and Conditions of the Licensing Agreement. The fines were high and the fishing companies could not pay them, so the Government banned them from Samoan waters and demanded that the Forum Fisheries Agency remove the vessels from their list of registered fishing vessels - thus banning them from fishing anywhere in the mid Pacific region. In 1995, only eight Taiwanese vessels reapplied for renewal of their licenses. The Government would not issue the licences for a one-year period, insisting on a six month licensing term. In the end, none of the Taiwanese vessels were licensed (Bell 1996). 

The Government issued two fishing licences to Tropac Fisheries Co. in 1994 and renewed them in 1995. They also issued two other new fishing licences, making a total of four licences issued in the year at WS$4,000 per licence or a total of WS$16,000 (US$6,586). 

The licensed longliners did not have impressive catches. The South Pacific Commission reported that in the five years from 1990 to 1995, they reported: 

  • 1993 - 204.5t total, of which 161.3t was albacore, 5.7t bigeye, 24.5t yellowfin, 8.7t billfish and 0.9t shark.
  • 1994 - 122.4t total, of which 122.4t was albacore, 2.7t bigeye, 11.9t yellowfin, 8.4t billfish and 0.8t shark.
The low catches and the controversy over the suspension of six long liners were probably influential in the non-renewal of fishing licences. 

In 1996, the United States Government paid Samoa about US$190,000 as its annual share of the funds divided equally between Forum Fisheries Agency members as part of the 1987 Treaty on Fisheries between the governments of certain Pacific Island Countries and the Government of the United States. 

Aquarium fish exporters shipped WS$47,704 (US$19,635) worth of tropical fish. 

The sea cucumber (beche-der-mer) fishery started in Samoa in late 1992. By mid 1993, five companies harvested, processed and exported sea cucumbers from Samoa to Chinese markets. By 1995, stocks of the more valuable species had declined and only three companies were able to keep fishing. Their exports, in 1995, were significant at WS$194,786 (US$80,175) (Bell 1996). 

Imports of fishery products were negligible during the 1986 to 1993 period, ranging from 3 to 4 metric tonnes per year according to FAO statistics. 

According to FAO (1993), and King (1989) the subsistence and village-scale fishery is the largest and most important fishing activity in Samoa. Data on subsistence fishing is difficult to obtain from the 330 scattered villages. A series of household surveys showed: 

  • Almost half of all rural households on Upolu go fishing at least once a week.
  • About 108 of Upolu's 140 villages have more than 33 per cent of households fishing.
  • There are 5,200 fishermen on Upolu supported by the extended family.
  • The outrigger canoe is the basic fishing vessel.
  • Fishing households average 2 fishing trips/week.
  • Fishing activities declined by 35 per cent between 1983 and 1990.
Most fishing took place along the shore, in shallow lagoons, and in the upper edges of the coral reefs (Figure 3). Collapse of these vulnerable fisheries would constitute a severe economic burden for Samoa because individual families that depend on the shallow nearshore areas for subsistence do not have the financial resources to buy boats, motors, or fishing equipment needed for offshore fisheries. Neither do they have funds to buy imported fish or locally caught commercial fish. 

Distribution of catch 

Figure 3. Areas fished by subsistence fishers in Samoa. 

 
Figure 4. Households that sell a portion of their fish catch. 
 
Traditionally, surplus catch was given to the extended family and others according to customary responsibilities (FAO 1993). Today a proportion of the catch is sold, the amount varying according to locality (Figure 4). The households selling the highest proportions tend to be nearest population centres, especially Apia. 

Top
Previous Next